Slashdot Mirror
HP Clarifies Indemnification Offer For Linux Users
After HP extended an offer of indemnification to users who purchase Linux through HP, SCO issued a strange press release: in it, SCO claims that HP's action actually supports SCO's claims that "issues exist" with the Linux kernel's legal status. In an article at NewsForge (like Slashdot, part of OSDN), HP's Martin Fink roundly denies SCO's backhanded interpretation; a followup story quotes Bruce Perens, Linus Torvalds and ESR on the HP offer. Linus: "Indemnification is wonderful. It might be a cynical marketing tactic, but if people are asking for it, why not?" The first article also points out the limited nature of HP's indemnification claims, which are definitely not blanket protection -- installing patches not approved by HP could well make them wash their hands of your machine.
SCO's interpretation is certainly correct. I predicted as much in the yahoo forums. It lends credence to the idea SCO has 'something.'
Of course this is only good news for SCO and those invested in SCO. Suing end users is a tragic mistake, but suing HP for the same purpose is much more surgical...
Why don't they start bombing, say, SCO HQ? That would be a nice change of pace.
Honey, I shrunk the Cygwin
/me sits and waits for the "rape is never funny" trolls/idiots.