Samba 3.0.0 Released
Matt writes "As posted on Samba.org the fine folks at Samba.org released their newest version of the popular free Windows File- and Print Server. Most famous additions are Active Directory integration and possibilities to form NT4 trust relationships. Release notes are online." See also their press release.
now my linux box has to deny having a relationship the that windows server next door.
...and possibilities to form NT4 trust relationships.
but is it wise to trust a NT4 server?
We've had Samba in Brazil for centuries...
;)
Amazing how the USA thinks they are ahead of everyone else...
I want to talk about Prevayler -- which is due to replace Samba in 2005. Anyway, noone uses Samba.
Take it easy? I'll take it anyway I can get it . . .
as we've seen so many times this week,
:-P
opensource != secure
by any stretch of the imagination, in fact there are probably numerous untold exploits available for this software. Its just a matter of time, as with any opensource product.
Yeah, so let's use the alternative.
Windows servers.
Those are more secure I heard.
Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
Version 3.0 - HA! I got Windows version 3.1 many many many years ago! loosers...
Finally! I was talking with a friend about this just the other day -- the only big thing that Samba is lacking is a working Bullet Drop Compensator!
:)
It really helps when aiming files across long distances
What happens is that if you fail to listen to your Primary Domain Controller, the Bondage and Discipline Cop steps in to beat and humiliate you until you submit creditentials to the proper authorities. Usually, this happens when you're standing in front of many people and attempting to get at Powerpoint slides you left on your client machine.
I forget what 8 was for.
Then, Gnome Vs. KDE
Now its MySQL Vs. Postgres
At least we are evolving from text editors and eye-candy to relational databases.
"Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
--Dr.W.Edwards Deming
Someone please explain why my post was moderated as redundant. I looked at all previous posts and did not see a single overlord comment. If the joke isn't funny then it should be rated offtopic, or overated, but not redundant. Unless, maybe the moderators were saying that the joke was getting redundant. I think moderators should provide an explanation for their decisions. That way posters would learn what makes a good post good and a bad post bad.
Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.