Slashdot Mirror
Linux Kernel Benchmarking: 2.4 vs. 2.6-test
frooyo pastes from kerneltrap: "Cliff White recently posted some re-AIM multiuser benchmark results comparing the stable 2.4.23-pre5 kernel against the 2.6.0-test5 and 2.6.0-test5-mm4 development kernels. In his conclusion he makes reference to earlier scheduler tests posted by Mark Wong saying, "Short summary: we mostly rock.""
Linux 2.6 is a FAILURE!!
It's up to 2 percent faster in certain hand-picked benchmarks!
I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
inux kicks Windows XP's ass into the next millenium. Let's hear it for the rocking 2.4 AND 2.6 kernels on AMD!!!! Fuck the Wintel conspiracy! Live free with Linux and AMD! You don't have to be raped by Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer any more.
BTW, Note to all Microsoft employees that astroturf on Slashdot:
We don't fucking care if you homos like sucking on Bill and Steve's cock every day. We aren't going to join in. We don't need the cock extenders and prostheses that you Windows weenies seem to need (GUI). We make real use of our computers by automating and making them do things for us. Not sitting at some stupid desktop. Have at me cocksmokers!
> I'd love to see Linux being the best OS for
> multiple CPU scaling.
I'm afraid you're going to have a long wait.
Linux isn't even close to the commercial Unixes
in terms of scalability, throughput, or uptime
in a multi-cpu configuration. Maybe someday...
Tom Huson, you're a jerk. A complete kneebiter.
Tom Hudson: The karma whore for the new millennium.
Holy FUCK, Einstein! What insight!
i dno't care about how well you can copy/paste. What's the statistics on casual sex with overweight girls and shemales?