Linux Kernel Benchmarking: 2.4 vs. 2.6-test
frooyo pastes from kerneltrap: "Cliff White recently posted some re-AIM multiuser benchmark results comparing the stable 2.4.23-pre5 kernel against the 2.6.0-test5 and 2.6.0-test5-mm4 development kernels. In his conclusion he makes reference to earlier scheduler tests posted by Mark Wong saying, "Short summary: we mostly rock.""
Suck it down biatches!
You are second post biatch
After all these years since I first tried to dial in to a Microsoft network I still can't do it without first compiling my own kernel and pppd! I'm just a bit annoyed as I'm sitting here watching my Debian Unstable kernel recompile. For one change: added CONFIG_PPP_MPPE=m. This is a frustrating waste of time! Will this be built in the 2.6 kernels, or do I have to hope that somebody comes up with a better implementation (in Debian non-free perhaps) for this?
hehehehe, reminds me of an old joke:
What do CmdrTaco and 2.6 have in common?
That's the average number of cocks Taco has rammed in his ass at any one time!
Ah, more importantly, does it have a screen that goes by and says that windows^Wlinux 2000^W2.6 kernel runs games faster than the previous version because the hardware is better?
Norris/Palin 2012
Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
That reminds me of an even older joke, involving Kathleen Fent and Red Hat 9.0
What the FUCK is wrong with YOU? HOW FUCKING DARE you suggest the Mods are anything but GODS? May you BURN IN HELL. Also, I suspect you are a gay pedophile.
w2k sucks!
and BSD is dyin'!
Gaim over!
Touche!
(accented chars are not showing!) Please correct this.
You suck!
Douche!