Slashdot Mirror


Measure The Speed Of Light With Your Microwave

maddmike writes "There is a very interesting article on About.com that shows how to measure the speed of light using your microwave to melt chocolate. "

34 of 296 comments (clear)

  1. Measuring the speed of light is easy by kfg · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just try to measure the speed of dar. . .

    Oh, nevermind.

    KFG

  2. Kids... by JessLeah · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...don't try this at home. Theobroma cacao (chocolate) is a highly dangerous substance with known stimulant effects. It is also highly addictive and should be used with extreme caution. Overdose can cause morbid obesity, sluggishness, and death. Only qualified experts should handle this dangerous reagent at home.

    I am experienced at handling this most hazardous material. Please wrap it carefully in a heatproof container, and mail it to me. It will be disposed of properly. (burp)

    1. Re:Kids... by kfg · · Score: 3, Funny

      Gee. Thanks. Now I'm having a Cadbury Fruit & Nut fit.

      I have an Easter Bunny on my back.

      KFG

    2. Re:Kids... by kfg · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, that's Bun-Bun.

      Zoe preserve me from the "gaping headwound of love."

      KFG

    3. Re:Kids... by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 4, Funny

      It is also highly addictive and should be used with extreme caution. Overdose can cause morbid obesity, sluggishness, and death.

      Yeah, well the guy put some dihydrogen monoxide (DHMO) into his microwave as well, so we know that he has no concern for his own safety or those around him!

    4. Re:Kids... by fredrikj · · Score: 4, Informative

      Water in microwaves can be quite dangerous though. Check out the "Coffee Explosion" part on this page.

    5. Re:Kids... by vofka · · Score: 5, Informative

      Hmm, Well it's not entirely true to say that water doesn't boil in a Microwave oven - nor is it true to say that the container does not get hot.

      Think about it - Fill a (microwave save) plastic pint jug with cold water, and put the jug in your microwave for 5 minutes on full power. Now, is the water hot or cold? Is the jug hot or cold?

      Of course, the answer to both questions is "hot". The energy from the Microwaves heated the water, and the heat from the water conducted from the surface of the water to the surface of the container, heating the container.

      This heating of the container allows normal boiling to take place (as evidenced by the fact that the microwave will have been full of steam after heating a pint of water on full power for 5 minutes, and that during the heating time, the water can be clearly seen to bubble in the container!).

      While it is definately true to say that water does not boil in the same way in a Microwave oven as it does when boiled in a pan on the hob, it is definately not true to say that water does not boil at all in a Microwave.

      In fact, plain water is the best way of cleaning a Microwave Oven - a fact I have on good authority from my Dad, who services Microwave Ovens used in the catering industry. Simply place a pint of water in the Microwave on full power for 5 to 10 minutes, then carefully remove the jug from the oven, and wipe down the inside of the oven with a cloth.

      Not only does this method make it very easy to clean the cooking part of the oven, it also helps to clean the inner workings of the oven, in particular the fans and air ducting from the main cooking area.

      --
      Disclaimer: I meant what I thought, not what I wrote! What? You can't read my Mind? Oh dear!
  3. Got that beat by divide+overflow · · Score: 4, Funny

    There is a very interesting article on About.com that shows how to measure the speed of light using your microwave to melt chocholate.

    Big deal...I can measure Hubble's Constant by charring bagels in my toaster. Pffft.

  4. Funny this should come up by Raul654 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I was just writing a wikipedia page yesterday on Famous Experiments, and that's the one I added. I read that Galileo tried measuring the speed of light the same way they measured sound -- by having two people stand a large distance apart, and flash a latern (for light) or make a sound. Subtract out the handler delay (a known quantity dependant on the person), and divide by two to get the speed of the wave. This works rather well for sound, but never worked for light.

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
    1. Re:Funny this should come up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      "This works rather well for sound, but never worked for light."

      Maybe that's because light is so amazingly fucking fast.

    2. Re:Funny this should come up by zcat_NZ · · Score: 4, Informative

      We measured the speed of light by flashing an LED very rapidly (several MHz). The driving signal and the output from a photodiode were fed through equal-length coaxial feedlines into the X and Y inputs of an oscilloscope.

      The photodiode was moved away from the light source one full wavelength, at which point the image on the screen became a straight diagonal line again.

      I've also seen it done by bouncing a laser off a rapidly rotating octagonal mirror, across a room and back to the same mirror, but that one's a lot harder to set up correctly.

      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
    3. Re:Funny this should come up by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I did the rapidly rotating octagonal mirror experiment in college. I got 2x10^8 m/s which is pretty slow. Either the mirror speed was off, or between runs I might have jostled the paper on the wall with the pencil marks marking the beam position.

      You can measure the wavelength of light pretty easily with a ruler. But it has to be one of those shiny metal rulers, and it has to have black millimeter marks. Shine your laser onto the black marks at a shallow angle, measure the positions of the diffraction spikes that are reflected onto the wall, and from that, calculating the wavelength is trivial. It works pretty well.

  5. History of light speed measurement by ramk13 · · Score: 4, Informative
  6. Measure The Speed Of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...Your Local Fire Department by placing some metal in your microwave and putting a blanket over it. =P

  7. This is boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Anyone can melt chocolate or heat water in their microwave.

    Real geeks use microwaves for what they were intended for... nuking free trial CDs from AOL.

  8. Half the experiment is missing by panurge · · Score: 4, Insightful
    In a proper physics experiment all the quantities that affect the result have to be measured. In this one the frequency of the microwaves is taken for granted, so it is not a proper experiment. Just reading the value off the label doesn;t count. All the experiment actually allows you to work out is the wavelength of the microwaves, which is not hugely interesting. So how do you measure the frequency?

    You cannot do it by measuring the dimensions of the magnetron cavities, because the calculation of the frequency based on dimensions assumes the thing you are trying to work out - the speed of light. Frequency counters that go up to 2.5GHz are a bit difficult to come by in most homes. One possibility might be to extract some energy from the cavity using a suitable antenna and mix it with the clock signal from a 2.4 or 2.53GHz motherboard, then try and pick up the resulting beat signal using a short wave or VHF radio. However, I'm not at all sure how to get the signal out of the P4.

    Has anybody got a better and reasonably practical method of measuring the frequency?

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
    1. Re:Half the experiment is missing by aziraphale · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, then you'll have to define your own 'metre' or your own 'second' to your satisfaction if you don't like that definition of the speed of light, since that is the speed of light (in a vacuum) - by definition. A metre is 1/299792458 of the distance light travels in a vacuum during the time it takes the radiation produced from a particular transition of a cesium 133 to cycle 9192631770 times.

      If you're making up your own units, you might as well say 'one second is the amount of time it takes the radiation produced by my microwave oven to cycle 2.4E9 times'

      But of course, this experiment isn't trying to find the speed of light in a vacuum, it's trying to find the speed of light in a microwave oven (or possibly in chocolate). I think that means using the defined value for c is acceptable, if you can find a decent way of using it to derive the correct frequency of your oven. But refusing to accept c would be.... problematic, I think.

    2. Re:Half the experiment is missing by panurge · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I really don't see why this is modded insightful. It's actually possible to reference the clock of a computer, or any other clock, to the cesium standard because it is possible to make use of radio broadcasts referred to clocks based on that standard. So in theory you could measure the frequency of the microwave oven - the frequency, notice - in terms of the international standard.

      The measurement you do in the microwave oven is a real-world measurement, i.e. of a displacement. If you have a real frequency and a real displacement, you can measure the speed of light in terms of your measured displacement and a time interval related tot he international standard.

      Your comment that "refusing to accept c would be problematic" is invalid because, in fact, the experiment doesn't assume a value for the meter, or for c. You could compare your measured interval to anything convenient - using compasses, just like a Greek philosopher - and measure the speed of light in terms of a reference in your house. It would be a valid outcome of the experiment to measure the speed of light in teaspoons per cesium transition. It isn't a question of making up units: it is a question of deciding on the real world analog of the reference unit, whether it be a standard meter, standard kilogram, or standard sack of sugar. The international definition of the meter is handy if you have a suitable interferometer, but you can still only use it to produce a substandard by making marks on something, or counting interference fringes.

      Anyway, why am I bothering? As I remind myself, this is /.

      --
      Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
    3. Re:Half the experiment is missing by hughk · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Cutting open a magnetron to check the cavity size works only if you have a spare! And in any case, the resonance of a Magnetron cavity depends directly on wavelngth and is only related to frequency by the speed of light (which you are trying to measure).

      The frequency will almost certainly be 2.45 GHz - a couple of other frequencies are allocated but aren't used much. The frequency isn't constant because the magnetron's operating frequency typically varies with temperature however for getting a 5% accuracy, it should be ok.

      One complication of measuring by beat frequency is that a magnetron is pulsed. The duty cycle allowing power control. The problem is that this may mess up any indirect measurements.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
  9. Measure the frequency of your microwave instead by boa13 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Summary of the method used in the article:

    * Slightly melt chocolate chips in your microwave
    * Measure distance between melted spots
    * This gives you (half) the wavelength of your oven
    * Multiply by the frequency of your oven, you get the speed of light

    That's certainly interesting, but guess what? Many scientists have done better (and much more expensive) measures, so we already know the speed of light quite well.

    What we might not know as well is the frequency of your oven. So I suggest you reverse the above formula, and you measure the frequency of your oven (not always printed on the back, as the article admits) this way.

  10. Re:neat idea... bad result by panurge · · Score: 4, Funny
    No, you thought wrong.
    Speed of light approx 300 000 km/s = 3E8 m/s.

    Actually, the easiest way to measure the speed of light is to measure the interval between the lights turning green and the first cab horn sounding during the morning rush hour in Manhattan, then measure the distance from the lights to the cab.

    Neither original nor practical, but then I am tired and this is /.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
  11. Melting "chocholate" and measuring c? by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 4, Funny

    maddmike writes "There is a very interesting article on About.com that shows how to measure the speed of light using your microwave to melt chocholate. "

    Bah, that's easy stuff. It's about time that About.com tackled the real holy grail of science - how to teach Slashdot editors to use a spelling checker.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  12. Re:turntable by shepd · · Score: 3, Funny

    >could someone please provide me with the equation if mine has a turntable?

    Step [1]: Using a highly detailed tool (1) you will first wrap around a plastic groove on the front of the microwave. You will then use this tool (1) putting a few newtons of pulling force translaterally against the groove. Too much pressure here may be dangerous, so use caution. If your microwave has no such groove, you'll press tool (1) against a reverse indentation on the front of the microwave using at least a few newtons of pressure. Overuse of pressure is not a danger when using the correct tool (1).

    Step [2]: At this point you'll be able to access the inside of the microwave. If you cannot access the inside of the microwave at this point, you have not successfully completed step [1]. Please attempt it again as necessary to access the inside of the microwave. Once access has been gained, you will use tool (1) to grip the edges of the glass object inside. Do not grip the glass object extremely tightly or it may be damaged! Now, using tool (1) exert an upward pressure to the glass object, causing it to levitate to the middle of the microwave (this point will vary depending on model).

    Step [3]: You must complete step [2] to continue to this step. If you are at this step, you are now gripping a glass object centered in your microwave. Pull this object towards you with tool (1). Continue to move this object and rest it on a flat, cool, surface. Ungrip the object. Using a choice of tool (2), exert a reverse pressure on the item disloged in step [1]. Continue to extert this pressure until a click is heard.

    Step [4]: There is no step [4]. If you have completed step [3], your microwave is now ready for the experiment in the article.

    Required Tools:
    (1) fingers
    (2) hand

    Optional Tools:
    (3) brain
    (4) article

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  13. Spoiler by kinnell · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's 3x10^8 m/s

    --
    If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
    1. Re:Spoiler by Captain+Nitpick · · Score: 5, Funny
      You are wrong by 207 542 m/s which is quite a large margin for keeping the Slashdot correction nazis at bay.

      On behalf of the Guild of Pedants and Correctors, I hereby state that a 0.0692% error is well within the acceptable error for most Slashdot posts.

      Quite frankly, we're usually happy if you people get within an order of magnitude of the correct value.

      (P.S. We really don't appreciate being called nazis. We may be fanatics, but we're not fascists.)
      --
      But then again, I could be wrong.
  14. I get more enjoyment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny


    ...out of trying to explain to the physics-challenged that microwaves are actually bigger than the little holes in the door screen.

    Some brave souls try to correct me by pointing out that "the microwave particles" are so small they can't be seen, so are clearly smaller than the holes.

    I then introduce the notion of particle/wave and laugh as I watch them go completely blank...

  15. Blast my taste buds! by MoeMoe · · Score: 3, Funny

    I was about to attempt this fascinating experiment but my stomach had... other plans

    Couldn't they have created this experiment with something less tasty, like broccoli?!

    --
    Business \Busi"ness\, n.;
    A scam in which all people involved perceive as beneficial...
  16. Using Ping to measure speed of light by AYeomans · · Score: 4, Funny

    You can always use your network cables instead; brief description or full paper.

    Anyone care to use the method with RFC1149 Avian Carrier Protocol, namely Using Ping to determine Speed of Flight!

    --
    Andrew Yeomans
  17. Nope... by dreadnougat · · Score: 3, Informative

    you're wrong, or at least outdated: http://lamar.colostate.edu/~hillger/meter.htm

  18. MST3K by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

    There was this episode of Mystery Science Theater 3000 (Secret Agent Super Dragon?) where the main character flips a light switch, and about half a second later the light dimmed down. Crow said "Light travels slower in his world". Heh.

    Hmmm.. sorry guys, it really is more of a visual joke.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  19. Re:The speed of light? by benjamindees · · Score: 3, Informative

    measuring the speed of microwaves, not light

    Microwaves are light. They just have a longer wavelength. The speed is the same as for visible light. It is only dependent upon the medium.

    if it needs 2 minutes to melt some chocolate, that's not very fast.

    Otoh, I wholeheartedly agree with this statement.

    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  20. Ants by BuilderBob · · Score: 5, Funny

    You can also measure the speed of light using ants, the ants are small enough that they can fit into the low energy points of the microwave.

    If you put some ants in the microwave, and switch it on, they all start moving from the heat into the cold spots, measure the distance between the cold spots and you have the wavelength.

    Obviously, you shouldn't *actually* try this, unless the ants happen to climb in there looking for food, then they're fair game :) And take the turntable out, that's cruel.

    The calculation (chocolate or ants) does still rely on prior knowledge of the frequency of the microwave(s) being used. Trying to measure the speed of light without a prior fixed frequency or wavelength is much more taxing. A shortwave radio can help though, or a flashlight and a large telescope (bouncing signals off the moon)

  21. Re:Funny this should come up - or maybe not by frovingslosh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You didn't measure the speed of light, you measure a wavelength. Unless you can show that you had some way to confirm the frequency of the light source that is not dependent on knowing the speed of light, then when you looked up the frequency of the light source you were effectively looking up the speed of light and using it to determine the speed of light. No wonder your answer came out close!

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  22. This won't work for most microwaves by ChrisCampbell47 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I'm surprised that nobody's posted this yet (or that that comment hasn't made it up above +2).

    This only works if you can stop the mechanism by which the microwaves are scattered around to make for even heating. If you have a turntable in the bottom of your microwave, then removed it might do the trick, but most microwave ovens have a rotating metal "fan" that is enclosed in the upper surface over the cooking cavity, and that metal fan spins to scatter the waves around -- think of it like a flashlight and a mirrored pinwheel. Hence no turntable is required.

    I'm not aware of any way of disabling that "fan", although I suppose you could drill a tiny hole in the shroud and poke in something to stop the spin, a la stopping a grinding PC fan. But I personally am not terribly interested in poking a drill into a microwave oven ...