Linksys Still In Violation of the GPL?
A reader writes:"From a recent post to LKML: "...Clearly, the kernel source that Linksys provided cannot be used to recreate the kernel that they are shipping with their product. Therefore, they have been, and still remain in violation of the GPL." Several heavy hitters have signed this one, including Jeremy Allison and Alan Cox." There's also commentary from David Turner and Bradley Kuhn of the FSF.
Isn't it enough of a victory for the profession that they have used an academically based operating system rather than a commercial one?
They could conceivably switch to Windows.
This is my sig.
post a rant on slashdot. It's well known that the RIAA, MPAA, Microsoft, SCO, etc. read weblogs to find out what uninformed 12 year olds think of them, and change business practices accordingly.
All this does is make companies shy away from Linux. Linksys should just move to BSD and forget about this GPL nonsense.
Yup. That's why GPL operating systems and software don't hit it big with technology companies. I won't develop anything for Linux because it's all expected to be GPL.
Steve's Computer Service, Hobbs, NM