CCAGW Misreads Mass. Policy, Open Standards Generally
mhrivnak writes "The Council for
Citizens Against Government Waste made this press
release blasting the Massachusetts policy decision to move to Open Source. They explain why Linux is a 'monopoly,' how this policy is
'socialist' and why 'The old Soviet Union could not have done this any better.' The CCAGW has been previously informed about the benefits of open source software in
government. Tell them what you think!" The CCAGW is at least not completely one-dimensional; the group
is also opposed to mandatory embedded
snoopware.
Maybe they don't realize that conventional
closed-source software
has
big costs worth avoiding.
"Intelligence is a constant. The population is increasing."
"Insanity is doing the same thing over again expecting a different result."
Your sig # 1 speaks to me.
- Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
So hack them. Their SSL implementation has serious flaws. I had to upgrade 2x in one day (because I was behind and the new version came out later on the 30th of Sept) 0.9.7c is the most recent. 0.9.6e is really f'ing old.