Slashdot Mirror


MIThril Jacket Showcases Wearable Computing

Codeine writes "The Seventh Annual International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC), to be held later this month, will again feature members of MIT's Media Lab showing off the group's MIThril jacket. Taking its name from J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings trilogy, the jacket combines body-worn computation, sensing, and networking in a clothing-integrated design, according to the project." According to a new paper (PDF link) to be presented at the conference, the latest version of this long-evolving system uses a Sharp Zaurus running Linux.

12 of 162 comments (clear)

  1. Umm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wasn't Mithril an extremely tough, lightweight metal? If you take a look at the picture, it looks anything but light & sturdy.

  2. So very tired... by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 3, Insightful

    WHY would I want to wear a computer?

    Don't get me wrong, I'm a geek, but technology is just getting absurd. I have no desire to "wear" my computer. Nor do I have any desire to play games on my cellphone. (In fact I don't even own a cellphone because of the hideously overpriced services).

    Maybe I have to hand in my geek membership card, but wearing a computer ranks right up there with wearing a refridgerator.

    1. Re:So very tired... by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "I have no desire to "wear" my computer."

      Of course not, the technology's being developed, then the apps that make it interesting will come. Personally, I think auto mechanics would love to have a wearable computer. Imagine having instant access to the internal workings of the particular car you're working on. Instant reference.

      " Nor do I have any desire to play games on my cellphone."

      What's wrong with that? Well I guess I can't entice you, but personally I've enjoyed having simple games to play. At the last movie I saw, I played snake while waiting for the stupid previews to be over. When I'm alone for a bit, like waiting for my meal to be served, I get on the net with my cell phone and get updated on the news. Can I live without? Sure. But I can make a little use of my time.

      " (In fact I don't even own a cellphone because of the hideously overpriced services)."

      Hideous? I pay about 10-15 bucks a month more than a landline, all my long distance is free, and my phone's with me all the time. I get better service and it only costs a little more than a landline that only works at.. uh.. home.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:So very tired... by binary+paladin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not just wearing a refrigerator but putting a putting a computer on your refrigerator. That always struck me as the most retarded thing.

      Funny thing about being a geek is this: A geek would do something like turn his Dreamcast into a web server or install a computer in a blender for the sake of doing so but would never use any of these devices.

      Now a toilet computer... that's what I want if for no other reason than the internet has much better bathroom reading material than my local paper and sometimes, when I really have to go, I don't have time to grab a book or the paper.

      And if Hot Topic can sell WWF material and still be frequented by fishnet wearing, coffee shop dwelling, whiny ass poets... then you can hate this device and still be a geek.

    3. Re:So very tired... by TGK · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's an MIT thing. I don't know why they don't just give it up. It's a stupid idea.

      No, it's not just an MIT thing and its not that stupid an idea. ENIAC didn't exactly conjure to mind a Micro PC with a flat panel display either, but the point was it was one of the first strides toward the kind of computing system that is becoming a fixture in Western homes (and many other parts of the world).

      Wearable computing is a technology that simply hasn't come to maturity yet. Things need to get smaller. But as some further down this page have done lets look at the possibilities.

      First, realize that the human body isn't designed to support any large quantity of hardware where most of the sensory organs are clustered, consequently we have to seperate the display from the CPU. The torso is an ideal place to put this sort of thing, both for weight purposes and for its relitivly easy access for the user (try typing on your head sometime).

      As for applications, the possibilities are limitless. I'll stick to Augmented Reality for most of my examples.

      1.) Imagine a surgon with a system capable of integrating the data from Xrays, CAT scans, and other probes on the fly and displaying that data in real time, actualy altering the view of the patients body. This amounts to fewer head movements, faster surgeries (particularly key in an ER), and fewer mistakes. This same principal can be extended to an auto mechanic, or any number of other occupations.

      2.) Tired of lugging your laptop, cellphone, PDA, etc around? Meet the ultimate virtual office. A pair of MEMS projectors mounted on a pair of sunglasses traces the "office" in 3d onto your retinas. Tracking systems (much like those allready in use today) track the movement of your fingers in relitive position to your body. By tracking these movements the user can type on a non-existant keyboard and navigate a 3d "desktop" in real space. Metaphors provide interfaces for important applications. Integrate an audio device with this and you can easily move your entire office to the bench in the park without anyone being the wiser.

      It doesn't take a lot of immagination to work out how this could be an amazing application. Yes, right now it looks like a bad cross between C3P0 and a Electircal Engineering project gone awry. Nonetheless, in 10 years you'll probably see it integrating into the lining of a designer series of jackets, sunglasses, and hats worn by every trendy highschool and college kid in the country.

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
    4. Re:So very tired... by colmore · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree, I'll quote one of my all time favorite philosophers, Calvin's Dad (from Calvin & Hobbes)

      "If we wanted more free time, we'd make devices that did things more slowly"

      Frankly, the prospect of leading a lifestyle that requires this level of access to information terrifies me. It pisses me off enough that I can't get any of my friends to write me a letter, even more that, because everyone I know now relies on cell phones, I have to have one too.

      I find technology to be expensive, time-consuming, and impersonal. I try to only use what I actually need.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
  3. Don't know if I would "wear" computing by Arciryon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Integration is all good, but as for integrating functions into clothing I believe it can be at the expense of flexibility. I would much rather have a lot of functions integrated in my mobile, and be able to bring those functions with me in situations that I might choose another attire.

  4. Looking forward to the Wireless version... by Solo-Malee · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In this day an age why the hell is anyone putting stuff together with so many cablkes. I can count at least 10 in the picture! Surely they can do better than this with the Bluetooth and Wireless possibilities that exist now? Nice idea, but I think I'll wait for the StarTrek Tricorder hologram projecting version instead

    --
    "If it's lost, it'll turn up. Things always do" "I love it when a plan comes together"
  5. Re:Would you want this? by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    so you would rather have to dig out your cellphone and dial from it instead of having you cellphone as a device on your belt and you simply say "dial steve at office" to dial steve's office number and then talk to him through the bluetooth headset?

    what you want is EXACTLY a wearable computer. just make the "cellphone" a black box with no buttons or silly microphone + speaker, oh and give it a decent processor, ram, storage, etc...

    nahh give me a wearable computer with a cellphone attachment.. think pcmcia card here...

    90% of the hardware you see is power and battery management. and that is the biggest problem. batteries today are a complete and utter joke compared to everything else... almost no power and life for a gigantic size.

    wearable computing is very cool, I used to be faster at typing on my handykey twiddler one handed keyboard than a regular keyboard. do I still do the wearable computing thing??? nope. but I'm not in college anymore with thousands of hours to spend on my projects (or get credit and funding for my projects!)

    but wearable computing is going that way... It's that you call it a cellphone and think of the phone as the central piece where as the "phone" really is a small accessory to the main computer.

    the thing holding it back is dirt cheap bluetooth and batteries that dont royally suck.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  6. For it to catch on it needs by stewwy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1. to be under $500 2. to have sensory feedback ;) 3. to be something that does porn

  7. What's Wrong With This Project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I had to wade through more buzzwords than I could handle before encountering any plain, simple descriptions of what the thing actually does. The site comes off like venture-funded arm-waving. The only thing it lacks are stock pictures of young business suits standing around shaking hands and smiling confidently.

    Aside from the display goggles, it doesn't look like there is nothing particularly cutting edge about the hardware. If you can do something interesting with a 25-pound PC strapped to your back and a big fat extension cord trailing behind you, it won't take MIT undergrads to stuff the applications into some lightweight jacket-mounted hardware. Thus, it's all about the applications.

    So what about the applications? Where are they described? I don't know. I got about as far into the site as I could before my little eyelids started to droop and my tongue started falling down the back of my throat, and I still didn't know what the killer apps were that I would be running if I had that jacket on right now.

    So, without a clue about what that jacket can do now, here're a few things I can think of that I would want it to do. Maybe it does these things.

    1) Something that allows me to quickly record, index, and play back audio and video snippets. If somebody says something, I want to be able to hear it again 5 seconds or 5 hours later. In the event of any Rodney King scenario, traffic stop, zeppelin accident, or anything else that one might want to have recorded later, I want to be able to start streaming whatever I'm seeing and hearing to remote backup.

    2) Something that allows me to know where I am right now and how to get somewhere. I want GPS, Mapquest, and if I go hiking in the cascades with it, I want the optional emergency locator beacon too.

    3) Something that allows me to surf. Finding restaurants and movie theaters and spare batteries will always be high on the list.

    4) All the PDA stuff you can think of. Phone book, calendar, alarm (with a snooze button that isn't too hard to find) and a cell phone.

    Y'know, when you get right down to it, putting this stuff on a jacket isn't really where you want it for day to day use. You want to stuff it all into something that you can put in your pocket. I think Nokia is already working on most of this stuff.

    1. Re:What's Wrong With This Project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      1) Something that allows me to quickly record, index, and play back audio and video snippets. If somebody says something, I want to be able to hear it again 5 seconds or 5 hours later. In the event of any Rodney King scenario, traffic stop, zeppelin accident, or anything else that one might want to have recorded later, I want to be able to start streaming whatever I'm seeing and hearing to remote backup.

      Go one step further and "start recording from 10 seconds ago".

      Imagine the possibilities of having everything you hear and see in a cyclic buffer of say 5 minutes, that you can dump to disk or offsite at any time.