USB 2 Devices Not Necessarily High-Speed
mgcsinc writes "Yahoo is running a story on how some manufacturers of "USB 2.0" devices are making hardware compatible with the USB 2.0 standard, but not necessarily its high-speed component." Sounds like the complaint raised earlier this year.
You mean my "USB 2.0" mouse is not high-speed?
This isn't much of a revelation, it just means that the USB connection isn't the bottleneck. ATA133 drives won't run at 133 MB/s, either, I wonder if someone's going to start complaining about that now. ;-)
Interested in open source engine management for your Subaru?
Dude you have no idea how fast some of us point/scroll/click.
Roommate1: Whoa, what's wrong with Tod? It looks like he's having a seizure or something?
Roommate2: Naw, he's fine, he's just surfing the net after 2 quad-lattes & a couple of red bulls.
Then you must be real angry, real often.
If you're getting 100Mbps over 100base-T, you're doing somthing you should tell the rest of us about.
'jfb
To spur "enterprise Linux," Big Bang, the distributed two-phase commit.
Mod parent sideways.
Karma is precious.
Weren't USB 2.0 "highspeed" devices actually the slow ones? So, if you have a slow device, it is highspeed, isn't it?
Or was it Big Speed?
Wait.
USB2.0 Huge Speed. No, that wasn't it
I'm seriously confused.
For a high-speed Pentium you will want a Pentium III. The Pentium 4 is only rated full speed.
When I type on my old USB 1.1 keyboard, it keeps dropping keystrokes whenever I type more than 1.3 million characters a second. Now with my new USB 2.0 keyboard I can safely type at 50 million characters per second without it dropping keystrokes!
All misspellings and grammatical errors in the above post are intentional and part of my artistic expression.