Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Will Vanderpool Make Linux More Popular?

Posted by simoniker on from the keeping-up-with-the-vanderpools dept.

Digitaldonkey writes "New Scientist is reporting that Intel's forthcoming multi-core processor architecture, codenamed "Vanderpool", could undermine Microsoft's dominance by letting other operating systems run simultaneously more easily. From the article: 'The chip will allow future machines to run, say, Windows XP together with Linux or the Apple operating system as easily as today's Windows computers run Word and Internet Explorer simultaneously.'"

2 of 316 comments (clear)

  1. Cool by TykeClone · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sounds similar to what IBM does with the AS/400 - allowing hardware subsystems to run different operating systems.

    --
    A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
  2. Re:Darwin by Raffaello · · Score: 5, Informative

    Stop posting this irrelevant link.

    Darwin is a Mach based unix, on top of which one can run X Windows. It is *not* Mac OS X. Specifically, The Aqua user interface (which all native Mac OS X apps use), the Carbon APIs (which legacy Mac apps, like Internet Explorer, and Photoshop use), and Cocoa, (which newer Apps such as Mail and Safari use), are *not* open source.

    Aqua, Carbon, and Cocoa are *not* part of Darwin. So, no, you cannot run Mac OS X just because there is an x86 version of Darwin. You can run yet another *nix on x86 with Darwin, but you cannot run Mac OS X.

    Are people really this misinformed? How did parent get modded up?