Slashdot Mirror


Slashback: Lamo, Trilogy, Searching

Slashback tonight brings updates on the recent Google hiccup, LookSmart and the FBI's note-snooping in the Adrian Lamo case, as well as (at long last!) a list of the theaters whose seats will soon be smooshed for far longer than usual under the weight of those dedicated enough to sit through 10 hours of Lord of the Rings. Read on below for the details.

Microsoft thinks LookSmart looks less smart. securitas writes "Internet search company LookSmart was dropped by Microsoft's MSN service today. MSN has decided not to extend its licensing contract with LookSmart beyond January 2004. The news is devastating for LookSmart since, 'Microsoft accounted for approximately 65 percent of listings revenues, and all of LookSmart's licensing revenue in the second quarter of 2003,' according to a company press release not listed on LookSmart's site. The move comes after LookSmart recently launched its own Overture-style pay-per-click service and indicates Microsoft is close to launching its new search engine technology designed to unseat Google for the search crown. All of this is against the backdrop of acquisitions by rival Yahoo. More coverage at SearchEngineWatch and a Reuters mirror at CNN Money."

They could have fixed this if they'd googled for an answer ... powerg3 writes "This follow-up, explains the Google wackiness posted yesterday. Here's the quote from the Google Weblog: '...when a spam result comes up in a search, Google not only blocks the spam, but every result after it. This means that for searches where spam results manage to rise to the top, very few -- sometimes zero -- results will be returned....It's pretty amazing that such a serious bug made it past Google's tests. It will be interesting to see how quickly it's fixed.'"

Pardon me, mum, can I borrow your hard drive? AndreL writes "The Guardian has an update about the BBC's digital archive plans. They're considering using P2P technology to avoid bandwidth bottlenecks. The bad news: because of technical, financial, and legal problems nothing will happen until 2006 at the earliest."

Please arrive in costume if at all. KTecumseh writes "The list of theaters showing the extended editions of LOTR as been revealed. You can check out the list at the official website, and before you look, pray that you live somewhere close by to take advantage of this once-in-a-lifetime experience. For those that can not make the full 10-hour saga, they are also showing the first two extended additions on different dates, but who wants to miss out on an entire theater of sweaty LOTR fans."

Shamus Arrigan asks plaintively "There is no mention of these ticket sales in any other country. Does anyone know when and where these tickets will be sold at? (Canada especially)"

Wait, are you fellas press? Dangnabbit! ccnull writes "Good news from the inquest against hacker Adrian Lamo. According to a paragraph in a Washington Post column (buried about 3/4 of the way down the story), the FBI appears to be backing off from pursuing reporters' notes in the case. Relevant quote: 'A Justice Department official says the FBI agent "acted out of turn" by not seeking approval from the U.S. attorney's office in Manhattan and Attorney General John Ashcroft's press office. "The agent did not follow standard procedures," the official says. "We're just not going to pursue it. It is the policy of the Justice Department to exhaust all other means before seeking information from members of the media."'"

Eh, what's a few orders of magnitude? Grant hayes writes: "It seems the decimal point in the Mono story you ran is being a bit ambitious. We should be reading Mono 0.28, not Mono 2.8. Check the link below as well as links there to other Mono resources; I see 0.28 throughout." Here's the Mono site -- guilty as charged. Thanks for the correction.

11 of 182 comments (clear)

  1. Additional article body by macshune · · Score: 4, Funny

    "...a list of the theaters whose seats will soon be smooshed for far longer than usual under the weight of those dedicated enough to sit through 10 hours of Lord of the Rings"


    And also those large folks that will play an inspired game of D&D after the movie.

  2. Cushions? Weight? by Ignorant+Aardvark · · Score: 4, Funny

    a list of the theaters whose seats will soon be smooshed for far longer than usual under the weight of those dedicated enough to sit through

    A, the deadly combination of 10 hours of sitting plus the 400 lb weight of your average LOTR nerd ... has been known to reduce the natural life of cushions by 95%.

  3. Re:10 hours of LOTR? by l810c · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I don't know how many of theaters have these, but the new theater opened up ~18 months ago near us. It has a VIP room with Fat Leather Recliners, separate sound system and private, close bathrooms. $200 for 16 seats. Definatley might be worth it for something like this.

    We got it for LOTR TTT. Tried to get it 3 weeks before Matrix2 and it had been booked for months. We went ahead an booked LOTR ROTK back in June.

  4. Not just with Lamo by phorm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Good news from the inquest against hacker Adrian Lamo

    For those that don't really like Lamo, consider this in the large scope that it is, overall, a victory for everbody's rights against rampant abuse-of-power.

  5. The Great White LOTR by orthogonal · · Score: 4, Funny
    "There is no mention of these ticket sales in any other country. Does anyone know when and where these tickets will be sold at? (Canada especially)"

    Glad to be of assistance to all out Canadian (or is it Canadien?) friends!

    Lord of the Rings will be playing at the following theaters (or is it theatres?) for our northern neighbors:
    • Cineplex Odeon, Detroit, Michigan
    • Fenian Moviehouse, Niagara Falls, New York
    • Bill's Movie Place, Seattle, Washington
    • Avalon Theater, Bismark, North Dakota (please note, American coins only!)
    • Ultimax Theater, Montpelier, Vermont

    We hope you enjoy our movies and our hemispheric hegemony! :)
  6. Re:Toilet breaks by kaan · · Score: 4, Funny

    I heard that there will be no toilet breaks, because it's all part of a contest. See, without toilet breaks, that will make it easier to distinguish who is really a hardcore LOTR fan and who is a poser. There will be judges monitoring the audience via hidden camera, and whoever earns the most points as a hardcore LOTR fan (dressing up in costume helps your score) will be awarded a full-size cardboard cutout of, umm, Gandalf. I am completely serious. Really.

  7. Re:Toliet breaks by product+byproduct · · Score: 4, Funny

    Toilet breaks? To enjoy the full experience of a non-stop 10-hour immersion, *real* LOTR fans will prefer this solution

  8. Never understood why the "extra" footage... by Hamster+Lover · · Score: 4, Insightful

    wasn't added to the movie to begin with.

    If you're in for a penny you're in for pound, as the saying goes. What difference is 20-30 minutes going to make on a 3 hour movie? Are people simply going to walk out at exactly 3 hours?

    The extra footage added to Fellowship really fleshed out the story and brought it closer to the book.

    Just my 2 cents.

    1. Re:Never understood why the "extra" footage... by Texas+Rose+on+Lava+L · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The shorter the movie is, the more times the theater can show it. The more times the theater shows the movie, the more tickets they can sell. The more tickets they sell, the more money the studio makes. Movie studios tend to do things that they think will make them money.

  9. What's happened to the concept of Intermissions? by TPFH · · Score: 4, Interesting

    400 lb weight of your average LOTR nerd
    Avarage?
    Average meaning mean I'm guessing.....
    If 400lb is the mean, what does a relatively heavy LOTR Nerd weigh? (Especially considering that some are quite skinny.)

    And 10 hours.... (and this is not a comment on the weight joke.) it's not just bathroom breaks but meal breaks that will come into play there. And no, eating junk food while watching the movie isn't a meal. Need good protein.

    In the past when a movie was 3 hours long you had an intermission in the middle. It is nice to get up and walk around every hour or so. I remember being suprised when Malcolm X didn't have an intermission. When they re-released Laurance of Arabia there was an intermission. I have not seen it yet but I heard that Shoah had more than one intermission.

    So what happened?
    Did we go through the 80s without any (mainstream) 3 hour movies and after so long a time movie studios forgot the concept?

    --
    This signature used to contain a cute kitty virus with ansii art. Please set the slashdot editors on fire. Thank you
  10. Re:Toliet breaks by Thing+1 · · Score: 4, Funny
    Wow that brings back bad memories. They're funny though, so I thought I'd share.

    I was in a bad car accident over a decade ago, I was unconscious and they had to put a catheter in for me to pee. I remember waking up on the gurney saying "I'm peeing and I can't stop!" and they said don't worry, there's a catheter.

    When they took it out it was a very unusual (unnatural!) feeling...

    The worst part though, was when I went to the bathroom an hour later. The nice nurse wanted me to use a bedpan, but I wanted to walk to the bathroom which I did. I sat down (broken collarbone and rib weren't conducive to standing), and when I started...

    I FARTED OUT MY DICK!

    This has never happened before, and I imagined that I had some serious internal damage. But when I told the nurse, she said, "Oh that's no problem, it must have just pushed some air in when we inserted the catheter."

    If that's common knowledge they should warn us... Or maybe that's one of the "perks," watching the look on people's faces (i.e. priceless)...

    Sorry I didn't mention LOTR. ;-)

    --
    I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.