Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Dismisses Apple's iTunes for Windows

fewnorms writes "Microsoft's general manager for the Windows Digital Media division, Dave Fester, yesterday dismissed the new iTunes for Windows version, saying it was too limited for the average Windows users. Choice quote: "[Apple's music store] ... is a drawback for Windows users, who expect choice in music services, choice in devices, and choice in music from a wide-variety of music services to burn to a CD or put on a portable device." Of course Apple doesn't feel to worried about this, simply stating their products will (and have) lived up to the hype." The points made are all valid- but contradictory to standard Apple product design where simplicity always takes priority over flexibility. Besides, iPod is growing market share, and iTunes will be the best choice for windows users who own it.

28 of 916 comments (clear)

  1. Oh yeah.... by dswensen · · Score: 5, Funny

    Microsoft preaching about giving users a choice. That's the funniest thing I've heard all day.

    1. Re:Oh yeah.... by Graff · · Score: 4, Insightful
      You cannot package music in a format, and sell it for the iPod unless you deal with Apple.

      You can't? Last time I looked you could package any music as an mp3, aac, wav, or aiff and the iPod would happily play it without a hitch.
  2. Music Player Selection by Crusader+of+Yore · · Score: 5, Funny

    >>if you use Apple's music store along with iTunes, you
    >> don't have the ability of using the over 40 different
    >>Windows Media-compatible portable music devices.

    Oh, shoot. I mean, that's really a big problem for me. I like to use my Rio on Monday, and Samsung mp3 player on alternate Wednesdays, and the Nomad for Friday afternoon... What am I going to do if I can only use my iPod? Horrors!

  3. Please remember. by DAldredge · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Choice to Microsoft is letting you pick from any of THEIR products. They do not use that word as we do.

    1. Re:Please remember. by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 5, Insightful
      iTunes, the overall jukebox app, works with other players, too. It's only the DRM'ed AAC files one buys from the iTunes Music Store that play only on iPods. There are plenty of reasons to use iTunes (and the iPod, for that matter) that have nothing to do with the iTMS. Both iTunes and the iPod were around a long time, being used by lots of people, before Apple ever even announced the iTMS.

      The Microsoft exec's comments are FUDful, as always - "choice"? Giving Windows users iTunes and the iTMS just gives them another choice (or set of choices), rather than taking choices away. Windows users can get iTunes and/or iPod (they don't have to use one to use the other, and don't have to use the iTMS to use either) and use them with other options.

      It's true iTunes and the iPod don't play WMA files (DRM'ed or otherwise), but how is that different from other Windows players (software and hardware) not playing AACs (or Ogg, or whatever)? It's also true the iTMS files don't play on players other than iTunes and the iPod, but how is that different from BuyMusic's (or similar services') files not playing in anything except Windows Media Player and DRM WMA-capable portable players? (Ok, there is a bit of difference there, since there's a greater variety of portables that play WMA files, but one might argue none of them are as good as the iPod anyway.) The point is that Apple's "vendor lock-in" for Windows iTunes/iPod customers isn't substantially different, if different at all, from that of most other legit music download outfits for Windows (at least, ones that offer lots of major label major releases). Moreover, iTMS files have far less obnoxious restrictions than most of them.

      Fester's comments are just so much FUD, like most public comments by MS officials. I wouldn't trust anything they say any farther than I could comfortably spit an elephant.

  4. Who is Microsoft to talk? by Txiasaeia · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "...Dave Fester yesterday dismissed the new iTunes for Windows version, saying it was too limited for the average Windows users..."

    Um, yeah, this coming from the company that's offering exactly *how* many music downloads?

    --
    Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    1. Re:Who is Microsoft to talk? by Isldeur · · Score: 4, Funny

      Um, yeah, this coming from the company that's offering exactly *how* many music downloads?


      Really? Perhaps you haven't seen their hit single "Developers! Developers! Developers!" You're missing out. Search for it with iTunes.

  5. It seems to me that.. by jvagner · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ..MS's path to more "choice" will include more baseline restrictions and DRM.

    If Apple can keep things a little simpler, and a little more limited, and offer the flexibility that they do (burning audio copies to CD, etc), as much as we geeks might complain, it's probably easier for the average consumer to grasp.

    Sure, I'd love to see a mainstream offering with a huge library selling DRM-less MP3s, but that doesn't seem likely to happen, and it's certainly not going to come from Microsoft.

  6. Has anybody noticed... by llamaluvr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    that music blips and skips A LOT when running on iTunes whenever you do ANYTHING else, even if it's just like opening Explorer or moving windows? When I tried it on my machine, it was very noticable, especially compared to Winamp 3, which hardly blips at all for me. My machine's no slouch, either - it's a P3 1.1 GHz with 512 MB RAM running XP Pro. I had like 3-4 programs open along with iTunes: a FTP client, Visual Studio .NET, and Mozilla, I think.

    I was just wondering if anybody else had similar problems. I mean, the interface is great, but if I can't code in VS while listening to music, then it's not very worth it to me.

    --
    Insightful: 76, Off-Topic: 379, Flamebait: 24, Funny: 152, Interesting: 201, Underrated: 55, Troll: 9, Total: 896
    1. Re:Has anybody noticed... by AnyoneEB · · Score: 4, Informative

      That is probably a hardware/OS problem. Your sound card IRQ is being shared with your video card's IRQ. You can check this by running MSINFO32 --> hardware resources --> conflicts/sharing. IRQ sharing occurs with Windows 2k/XP on older computers (older than P4/Athlon XP) with ACPI enabled. This problem is discussed on the WinAmp tech support boards in topics linked from here under the heading "RE: Skipping / freezing / distortion, clicking & popping during playback".

      --
      Centralization breaks the internet.
    2. Re:Has anybody noticed... by .com+b4+.storm · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That is probably a hardware/OS problem. Your sound card IRQ is being shared with your video card's IRQ. You can check this by running MSINFO32 --> hardware resources --> conflicts/sharing.

      And that, ladies and gentlemen, is why Apple will not sell OS X for PCs.

      --
      "Wow, you're like some kind of superhero able to ward off happiness and success at every turn."
      -- Ryan Stiles
  7. Cat got your tongue? by sebi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Windows users like choice? Then why do most of them use Internet Explorer, Outlook Express and, well, Windows? They generally take what they are fed, right? Microsoft doesn't yet have a solution of their own for legal music downloading as far as I know. So they need some aggressive rhetoric. I was under the impression that the iTunes music store had one of the largest catalogues out there. Does the general user want to use a plethora of services to locate the right song? I don't think so, but I don't work for Microsoft's media division.

  8. Microsoft is scared by FunWithHeadlines · · Score: 5, Interesting
    "drawback for Windows users, who expect choice in music services, choice in devices, and choice in music from a wide-variety of music services to burn to a CD or put on a portable device."

    ROFL! Talk about naked FUD. Choice, choice, choice. Yeah, that's the Microsoft Way, isn't it? NOT. What hypocrisy!

    It's not even accurate. You CAN burn iTunes Store music to a CD. Rip it again to MP3, put it on any device you want. Oh wait, iPods are just about the best device you can use, so I'm just guessing that if you have an iPod you don't have too many other devices you care to have. For that matter, no matter what device you have, you probably don't have too many others. Why would you? Use what works and done with it.

    Choice in music? Well, the biggest choice is probably Kazaa, but that's beside the point. We're talking about the pay sites, and iTMS has 400,00 and growing. Not much of a problem, and becoming less so as time goes on.

    Apple just signed with Pepsi and AOL to do cross-marketing. That's some big partners to get the word out. But the word is out already. I see so many iPods in use it's amazing. In short, Apple did something right and Microsoft is running scared about it. With only the Mac market so far, Apple captured, what, 30% of paid downloads. Now the other 90% can use their service, so watch out Microsoft.

    1. Re:Microsoft is scared by gfilion · · Score: 5, Informative

      With only the Mac market so far, Apple captured, what, 30% of paid downloads. Now the other 90% can use their service, so watch out Microsoft.

      No, with only the Mac market, iTMS has 70% of the paid music downloads. Imagine what they'll have after Pepsi will have given 100 000 000 songs for free!

      30% is the iPod market share, and they have 50% of the revenues for portable digital players.

    2. Re:Microsoft is scared by CountBrass · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They should be scared.

      August 2002 I bought an iPod. Loved it so a month later I bought a PowerBook, my first ever Mac.

      September this year I bought a DP G5.

      And I plan to replace my wife's PC with a Mac sometime soon.

      Without the iPod I would never have even considered a Mac. Microsoft should be scared.

      --
      Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
  9. Windows Media Format vs. AAC by HebrewToYou · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Windows media == closed format supported completely over windows and partially on the Mac and *nix. AAC == open format (Mp4) supported completely over all major platforms. DRM rules -- unlimited CD burning over the iTunes music store, three separate computers able to play downloaded tracks, unlimited iPod transfers. I truly don't understand the criticism coming from MS over the iTMS and iTunes music software. Apple has never claimed it's the end-all software jukebox -- but, as others have pointed out, it's very simple and straighforward. Much like iMovie compared to FCP or CakeWalk to ProTools, iTunes is a simple way to manage a library of music and transfer it to a number of different formats. You can easily convert CD's burnt from Mp4 (AAC) tracks over to mp3 by merely ripping the burnt CD. That allows folks to still use Mp3-CD's with their entire collection and to share them with whomever they'd like. All that I feel coming out of Redmond right now is Hot Air....especially after hearing Longhorn ain't arrivin' until '06. Long time to wait, so I'm sure there will be lots of potshots directed at Apple in the meantime.

    --
    I'm not popular enough to be different.

    Homer Simpson, The Simpsons

  10. Stop wasting your time on lousy software by dten · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I downloaded iTunes yesterday. Within 5 minutes I had imported my music library, set up all the options I wanted, and I was listening to music. It has a very pleasant interface and includes all the features I want -- nothing more, nothing less.

    Who wants crazy flexibility when you don't even use half of the extra options and they just clutter up the user experience? I'm ditching the other jukeboxes I've been suffering with all year and sticking with iTunes. It may even influence me to buy an iPod -- if it works as seamlessly and easily as iTunes, sign me up.

    I'm tired of frittering away so much time trying to overcome the learning curves of PC software and trying to get programs to work and play together. I'm not into computers because I'm in love with jerking around in advanced options settings all day long, I'm into computers because of what they can do for me. My job already pays me to spend 10 hrs a day getting computers to work, I don't want to spend the rest of my free time doing the same thing.

    Mac stuff works, first time, every time, it does what you expect it to do. I think that just might be worth paying for. I think I'm going to start saving my pennies for a nice little PowerBook.

  11. SONY Should be the Angry One Here by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 4, Insightful
    SONY should be the angry party here. They could have owned the iPod market for Windows, and they let their music division shoot down their technology division.

    Funny how they still sell so many CD-burners and blank media though, isn't it?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  12. if you're using iTunes for windows... by Greenrider · · Score: 5, Informative

    be sure to check out your QT settings in the control panel. If the audio out is set to DirectSound, you will probably experience muddy audio clarity. Change it to waveOut and the clarity should be just as good as it is in Winamp.

  13. Obligatory Princess Bride Quotation by MacGod · · Score: 4, Funny
    "They do not use that word as we do."

    "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."

    --
    "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one " -Albert Einstein
  14. The domination of Apple in the music industry by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    After watching the presentation Apple gave on the release of the new iTunes features I have to say that everything else doesn't even seem to be coming close to Apple's position of sheer domination.

    iTunes is a nice start, but to have it for both platforms AND the best mp3 player on earth AND have every AOL user on the planet instantly be abel to use the ITMS (it uses the credit card from the AOl account) AND have Pepsi do a huge push during the Superbowl to give away 100 million songs (and at the same time having literally millions of people install iTunes in short order) AND having a means for parents scared of lawsuits to provide music for kids (allowance) AND to have thousands of audiobooks and other great content like NPR shows...

    Apple has set a goal of 100 million songs downloaded in the first year of iTunes (starting in April). But frankly I think they have set their sights way too low. I think 200 million by next April is not out of the question, and probably really low.

    One other benefit that Apple has, is that the musicians themselves are generally rooting for the store. I don't know how much of an effect that will have, if any... but a groundswell of artists demanding to be on ITMS cannot hurt.

    I have to say, if I were trying to start up another music store right now I would be quivering - even if I were Microsoft, and none of them are! I have to wonder how long it will be before Microsoft sees the whole industry slipping from them and offers a music store directly screwing over all the partners based on WMP.

    I don't understand why Dell is trying to do it's own server and doesn't just cut a deal to install iTunes on all Dell desktops. There's a plan for Gateway - are you listening?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  15. but you do have choice! by mabhatter654 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    You can run your iTunes on Mac OR Windows...try that with WMA! As long as Apple makes it easy to choose to move your files to something else...say A MAC then you've got plenty of choice...at least more than you get with MS.

    Lets see, Airport [wireless + modem] iPod, apple cinema displays...all work with PCs too...but work even better with a mac. When apple REALLY figures this out [and they're starting to!] MS will finally have to pay the piper for abusing their market!

  16. Re:no scripting required by DAldredge · · Score: 4, Funny

    Judging by the audio you listen to, couldn't you just hook up a randomnumber generator directly to your speakers and listen to that? It would always be random and I do not think you could tell the difference.

  17. Re:The best choice? Guess again. by ruiner13 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "I tried iTunes for a day and got frustrated with its limitations."

    Exactly what limitations are you referring to, mr. vague? The only limitation I can possibly think of is the use of AAC for the music store files, but those can be easily transcoded into just about any format you want (wav, mp3, even wma by using an intermediary step). I'd hardly consider that a limitation. Yeah, you may lose *a bit* of quality by recompressing, but if you use a high enough recompression quality setting, you can really minimize that to the point it is a non-factor. Care to elaborate on the limitations now? I mean it rips into a multitude of formats (with very high levels of control over compression), it burns to DVD, CD in many different formats (MP3 CD, Audio CD, and Data CD), and has some of the best streaming support I've found in any music player, not to mention the ability to easily share your tunes over a network with no configuration outside of clicking a check box. I think it is a fantastic product, mac or windows, and I give kudos to Apple on a job well done.

    --

    today is spelling optional day.

  18. Re:iTunes for Linux? by Ilan+Volow · · Score: 4, Informative

    When will I finally have a good user interface to play music under linux?

    When the linux developers start caring about interface design as much as they care about kernels.

    --
    Ergonomica Auctorita Illico!
  19. Re:"Open up?" by Llywelyn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Brief correction.

    IIRC, AAC is actually an ISO standard and is used in MPEG4 and is significantly better than mp3s which are at much higher bitrates. WMA is wholly owned by Microsoft and doesn't seem to offer appreciable sound benefits over mp3s.

    --
    Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
  20. iTunes is Open by piscoBandito · · Score: 4, Informative

    iTunes for Windows requires Quicktime 6.4 to be installed for it to work (or 6.3 for the Mac version).

    Why?

    Because all the decoding of the AAC files - both DRM'd and non-DRM'd - is completed through the QuickTime libraries (NOTE: this is also a way to get iTunes to play ogg/vorbis encoded tracks). ANY application that makes the appropriate calls to the QuickTime API can decode and play tracks ripped by iTunes into AAC and tracks downloaded from the iTMS (assuming the computer is authorized to play them).

    So, in theory, it's possible to get WinAMP to play files downloaded from the store if you don't want to use iTunes as your player software. Toast for Mac already can burn tracks ripped by iTunes and/or downloaded from the iTMS onto an audio CD.

    The only problem is audio device support, but Apple likes it's iPod sales and Hell already froze over, so we probably won't be seeing WMA support on the iPod or iTMS compatibility on 3rd party devices ever - or at least not until iPod sales start slipping in a major way.

  21. Re:"Open up?" by LMariachi · · Score: 4, Informative
    BTW this is something I don't foresee Apple ever doing with their products, but could be surprised.

    Surprise, surprise.

    Oh, and where exactly are you finding all this Dolby 5.1 music? Or do you just spin movie soundtracks at parties?