Slashdot Mirror


Baffling the Spam Bots

dumpster_dave writes "Scientific American is running an article, Baffling the Bots on techniques to outsmart and subvert spam bots and their chat-room cousins via CAPTCHA. You have probable seen this in the form of images containing text as gate-keepers to various on-line services. The latest evolution is using non-words and distorting the text such that even the best AI systems cannot decipher them, yet humans can not help but do so [cf., Gestalt Psychology]."

14 of 350 comments (clear)

  1. Re:I've always thought by gantrep · · Score: 2, Funny

    Are you sure they wouldn't end up at http;\\www.\..org/?

  2. Re:I don't receive any spam by benna · · Score: 2, Funny

    50 bucks says all the AC replies to this parent are from the same IP.

    --
    "It is not how things are in the world that is mystical, but that it exists." -Ludwig Wittgenstein
  3. Re:Captcha is fucking stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny
    Sorry, but until Captcha does the image fucking shit dynamically, this fucking shit is gonna be haz0rable. Trouble is, dynamic generation takes fucking cpu resources.


    It doesn't even fucking matter if that cocksucking Captcha shit is dynamically generated. Rather than batching up the goddamn images, batch your motherfucking account creation requests. When a would-be wanker visits your lame-ass pr0n site, your server begins motherfucking trying to create a Yahoo account (or what the hell ever), and feeds the dynamically-generated Captcha image shit to the human processing bitch. Perhaps it will fucking slow down your cocksucking rate, but that's just a matter of advertising your pr0n site better... by motherfucking spam or google bombing from your cocksucking Yahoo accounts, perhaps.


  4. Re:A better way to do this... by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have a better idea : present a complex differential equation and ask the person to solve it in less than 10s. If he fails, he's human.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  5. Re:Blind Users by Talez · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's part of the three pronged attack on spam.

    1) Obfuscate e-mail addresses
    2) Stop spammers from getting to places containing real email addresses
    3) Keep stupid people off the internet so the revenue stream of spammers is cut off.

  6. Re:Aren't they trying too hard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    It's you. ODVIGUSE is the word.

  7. Re:Blind Users by Pathwalker · · Score: 2, Funny
    For some time, I've felt that math is the answer to verifying that a viewer is a human, and still keeping the test accessible to the widest number of disabled people.

    A couple of simple math/logic problems such as these should be suitable:
    1. Find the two roots of x*x-16x+60=0
    2. What are two numbers who have the sum of 16 and the product of 60?
    3. From the following facts, what can you infer about Albert?
      • All men are mortal.
      • Albert is a man
    Simple puzzles like this should be able to be figured out by almost all people in a few seconds, and can be expressed in plain text, making them accessible to the blind.
  8. type what you see: by gfody · · Score: 3, Funny

    <img src="it_says_kitten.jpg">

    heh dumb bot

    --

    bite my glorious golden ass.
  9. Re:Aren't they trying too hard? by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 2, Funny
    Am I the only one having troubles deciphering the second word on the second picture?

    It says:

    NVIRGIE
    OBVIOUSE
    HURCHES

    I'm not sure what the hell that means, but if they're expecting someone to come up with other words in place of those then they're really expecting too much. Anything this complicated isn't worth it.

  10. Re:Instead of Text? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    Example: In month one you ask "What's in the picture?" A: A boat. Month 2 asks: "What shape are the boat's sails?" etc.
    Actually, any Zork player would know that it would go like this:

    What's in the picture?
    > BOAT
    Sorry, I don't know the word "BOAT".
    > SHIP
    Sorry, I don't understand what you are trying to say
    > YACHT
    Sorry, I don't know that word. Please try again.
    > HELP
    Help is not available.
    > XYZZY
    Hello, Dr Falkner!
  11. Re:Aren't they trying too hard? by danila · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, second one might be ODVIOUSE or even ODVLOUSE, but I don't think the second letter is B.

    --
    Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  12. Easy by fredrikj · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just do a Burrows-Wheeler transform on your e-mail address. Comes with the bonus of preventing stupid people from trying to contact you.

  13. Re:Blind Users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "3) Keep stupid people off the internet so the revenue stream of spammers is cut off."

    Nobody will get much of a revenue stream from the few hundred left.

  14. Re:Aren't they trying too hard? by herrvinny · · Score: 2, Funny

    I thought at first it was "CDVIOUSE". The first letter looks a lot like a C, especially with that big chunk cut out of it's right. The second looks like a D to me, because all the top of the B is cut off. Are you sure it's supposed to be "OBVIOUS"?