University Chooses Apple RAID for Linux Cluster
An anonymous reader writes "A Linux World article describes how Swinburne University chose Apple's Xserve RAID
to add storage to it's Dell linux cluster, as
it was the cheapest solution. Apple was
sceptical about its RAID system working with Linux, but the system was up and running in 15 minutes."
"According to Bailes, the centre records 13TB of data per day, which gets processed in real time down to 30GB and then compressed further to 3KB."
OK, can someone to explain to me that either yes, there is a lot of redundant data that can have crazy-good compression rates, or that no, this quote is wrong...
I've been booting my Linux boxes from my XServe RAID for months now. It's just a fibre array. And the XRAID Admin program is a straight Java applications so you can run it on any platform that supports Sun Java 1.4.1.
Go figure.
It's not rocket science. These devices have been engineered using standards of the industry.
Doh!
Don't Ask Questions. I don't know the answers and even if I did I wouldn't tell you.
During the conference held couple weeks back at Melbourne Uni, the guy from Apple Australia explained to us as to why Swinburne TAFE decided to use the XRAIDS. As it's the only one that supports IDE (He went on to say that the whole reason why RAID is there for is to reduce the costs, yet others use the more expensive SCSI drives) it was the cheapest way to transfer the data from Parkes to Hawthorn. They basically get a van, pack the HDs onto it once the data is collected, and drive back to Melbourne, which is still cheaper and faster then transferring all the data through existing network channels. The ultmiate connectionless network =)