Slashdot Mirror


Wall Street Journal On The Switch

An anonymous reader writes "Walt Mossberg, the Wall Street Journal's personal technology columnist, has long appreciated Macintosh, in a very unbiased, but still probably slightly business-oriented way. Today, in honor of tomorrow's "Panther" release, he has a very positive article in favor of "consumers and small businesses" switching for peace of mind. "If you're tired of the virus wars, the Mac can be an island of serenity.""

6 of 91 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Macs are great for many reasons - so are pc's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    I'm on a crusade. I intend to post a comment like this one whenever I see anybody use "virii." (You're getting it, too, Gene, because you were dumb enough to say "viri," which while less wrong than "virii" is still wrong, wrong, wrong.) Please don't interpret this comment as either endorsement of or disagreement with the parent post. Moderators: with your help, we can wipe out "virii" in our lifetime!

    The plural of "virus" isn't "virii." There is no such word. The plural of "virus" is "viruses."

    Here's a good explanation from cdknow.com, quoted here in its entirety because the people who most need to read this won't click on a link.

    The correct English plural of virus is viruses. Please consult any good dictionary before making up words.

    For the purists, in Latin, there is a rarely-used plural form:

    virus, viri (neuter)

    (Forms: almost always restricted to nominative and accusative singular; generally singular in Lucretius, ablative singular in Lucretius)

    The point of this is that even in Latin the form "viri" is rarely used. The singular form is used in most every instance. (This is from the Oxford Latin Dictionary.)

    So, when considering the Latin: "virii" is incorrect and "viri" was almost never used.

    Despite the fact there was little use for the plural form, there is another reason why "viri" was rarely used. The most common Latin word for "man" is "vir" with "viri" being its plural in the form used as the subject of a sentence. Thus, since "men" as the subject of a sentence would be used far more often than "venoms" (virus means venom) the "viri" word was most commonly seen as the plural of "man."

    Bottom line: Don't try to make up words using a false Latin plural form. Since the word virus in its English form is now used then the English plural (viruses) should be used.

    More plural-of-virus resources:

    perl.com, the canonical and exhaustive source
    The alt.comp.virus FAQ
    Jonathan de Boyne Pollard's Frequently Given Answer
    Merriam-Webster's "Word for the Wise," January 20, 2000.

  2. Re:Now is the time to switch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    how come the grandparent of this post gets 'funny' yet the parent of this post get 'troll'.

    YOU MODERATORS ARE CRACK SMOKING ANAL RETENTIVE MORONS

  3. Hi Crusader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    please note:

    There are a couple of non english speakers out there (like me).

    Please don't bother us with extended scrutiny of our syntax. You can do that with you local newspaper, or in your neighbourhood, or even at your school. But the internet is international.

    You should be glad that there are people who learn a foreign language to be able to share their thoughts (also) with you.

    So forget the details, please.

  4. Re:Now is the time to switch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    does it really matter?

  5. How long till the Apple Branded Cellphone/PDA? by kabocox · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Apple came out with the i-mac.
    Apple came out with the i-pod.
    Apple came out with the i-tunes.

    How long until Apple comes out with a branded Cellphone/PDA?
    How long until Apple joines forces with Sony just so for PS4 Sony can put that cute Apple logo on the machine. (And they could reintroduce the Apple Stickers too so folks will buy more than one just for the stickers.)

    Be devious.
    Be evil.
    Profit!!

  6. Apple Laptop Keyboards Unsuitable for Unix Users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Apple laptops are effectively unusable for unix users.

    I am a long-time Unix user. That means I need to have the Ctrl key to the left of the A key. This is a genuine need, not merely a want; it is based upon ergonomics. The Ctrl key is heavily used in unix, and it must be easily accessable. It cannot be off in the lower left corner of the keyboard where it is difficult to get at, and where it distorts the position of your left hand such that you can't easily type other keys while holding the Ctrl key down.

    Apple desktop keyboards are now all USB. They are all OK. The CapsLock key can be re-mapped into a Ctrl key.

    Unfortunately, even in this modern age, all Apple laptops have built-in ADB keyboards. The ADB keyboard is broken-by-design. It is, in general, not possible to remap the CapsLock key into a Ctrl key.

    There are some exceptions, but they are horrible kludges. They are horrible kludges because the original design of the ADB keyboard was a horrible kludge. The correct solution would be for Apple to re-design their laptop motherboards to use built-in USB keyboards. This hasn't happened yet. If you run Linux, use Debian's solution. For Mac OS X users, uControl works. There are no solutions (that I know of) for either NetBSD or OpenBSD. Please note once again that the "solutions" above are in fact kludges, because of the original bad design of the ADB keyboard.

    Apple provides a technical note on how to remap the keyboard, but provides no solution to the hardware problems caused by the design of the ADB keyboard. This tech note helps foreign language users, but does nothing for the CapsLock/Ctrl problem.

    Apple is (currently) ignoring Unix users! This is not merely speculation on my part. In an on-going email exchange I am having with an Apple employee (whom I won't name) in their marketing department, the Apple marketing person directly stated to me that Apple was catering to their historic Mac customers, and is purposely ignoring the Unix market. He also claimed that Apple would soon start paying more attention to the Unix market. I won't hold my breath. Apple has been ignoring Unix users for more than 13 years. I expect that trend to continue. (Also note that my Apple contact indicated that Macs would never ship with a 3-button mouse, even though Apple intended to port almost all X-window software and deliver it either on a CD/DVD or installed directly on each Mac's hard drive. How Unix friendly is a 1-button mouse with X programs that often require 3 buttons?)

    Apple has now lost two opportunities to sell me hardware. I really wanted an Apple laptop for their superior battery life, and for the PowerPC with Altivec CPU. (The Altivec is vastly superior to the x86 line for DSP.) Because I can't live with the broken-by-design built-in ADB keyboard in all Apple laptops, Sony and IBM sold me laptops instead. If Apple fixes this problem, they will sell me a PowerBook next year; if they don't, I'll still be running OpenBSD on x86 hardware, and wishing I could use a Mac.