Apple Posts Server Command-Line and JBoss Manuals
critterboy writes "Apple today posted copies of the Mac OS X Server version 10.3 Command-Line Administration and Java Application Server documentation for both JBoss, Tomcat and WebObjects."
← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)
Apparently there are new classes in Panther called NSController that are funky and cool coding goodness... but they are all NDAd or something, so I can't find any info on them yet. Wonder when they will post that documentation. Hmm.
shouldn't /. switch the blue "aqua" X logo to the new brushed-metal "panther" logo? panther's out tonight, you know.
NSController is cool and all,
IIRC that was introduced in 10.2.7 (Jaguar).
Go figure... Anyways, the new docs are truly
Great. This is sweet for all of us
Enterprise users. Just out of curiousity, does the
Recent switch from tsch to bash have to do with the
!command-line admin update?
It seems that JBoss and J2EE are available as standard on Panther Server. If I remember correctly then this was not the case with Jag Server.
Starts up with basic commands (ssh and the like), giving way to more in-depth info, XML configuration files, etc.
There seems to be some sort of centralized group of commands. For instance, there is the 'systemsetup' command, that handles a plethora of tasks: energy saver, time, sleep-wakeup, languages, startup... That might be helpful and a cool deviation from the traditional make-changes-in-many-places syndrome that has plagued UNIX and the like for years.
OTOH, there's a nice review of Panther Server with cool screenshots on Maccentral.
For the time being, Apple will ship the Xserve with Jaguar Server and Panther Server for those organizations that need a bit more time before they upgrade.
Apple isn't asking them to make a choice, they're saying "If you use Jaguar server now, keep using it, but here's a copy of Panther server so yo can upgrade to it when you're ready."
Could you ever imagine Microsoft allowing Dell, HP or Compaq to ship 2000 and XP on the same order just in case the customer was using 2000 and didn't want to upgrade to XP yet?
Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
I don't want to start a holy war here, but what is the deal with you Mac fanatics? I have recently upgraded from a Mac 8600/300 w/64 Megs of RAM to a new G5 dual 2GHz with AGP 8X and PCI-X to help me at my freelance gig where I copy a 17 Meg jpeg file of a naked and petrified natalie portman in a bowl of hot grits
from one folder on the hard drive to another folder. On the G5 I spent about 20 minutes trying to install Adobe Arcobat 6. 20 minutes. At home, on my Pentium Pro 200 running NT 4, which by all standards should be a lot slower than this Mac, the same operation would take about 2 minutes. If that.
In addition, during this file transfer, my iPod will not work. iTunes has ground to a halt. Even Safari is straining to keep up as I type this.
I won't bore you with the laundry list of other problems that I've encountered while working on various Macs, but suffice it to say there have been many, not the least of which is I've never seen a Mac that has run faster than its Wintel counterpart, despite the Macs' faster chip architecture. My 486/66 with 8MB of ram running MS Windows NT4 that has the SoBig and Blaster virus runs faster than this G5 dual 2GHz machine at times. From a productivity standpoint, I don't get how people can claim that the Macintosh is a superior machine.
Mac addicts, flame me if you'd like, but I'd rather hear some intelligent reasons why anyone would choose to use a Mac over other faster, cheaper, more stable systems.
I'm sorry, but i did not find "WebObjects" mentioned once in the two relevant PDF's. The only thing is that the JBoss Admin app is a WO App, given the .woa in the url of the webbased program. I'd expect seamless JBoss integration, but seamless WebObjects integration?
"Xserve and WebObjects Power iTunes Music Store" writes Jim Dalrymple on MacCentral. "Apple based the store on Mac OS X Server and Web Objects 5.2 using Xserves and Xserve RAIDs to store the more than 200,000 songs available to the public." [Jun 03 2003]
So Apple or webobjects developers, fill us in. What ever happened to the the XServe serving the iTunes Music store running WebObjects?
Any future FileMaker lookalike plans?
WebObjects Inc. ?
--------
* Sigh *
Proof that if you beat a dead horse often enough, it just might get off its fat rump and do something for you! How long and how often have we bitched and moaned about Apple docs?
There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
Yes, that's it. Apple published over two thousand pages of documentation because you complained on Slashdot. That's exactly what happened.
In other news, the Tooth Fairy and Santa Claus are getting married at the Easter Bunny's Malibu beach house. Film at eleven.
Lamebrain.
It is the "colloquial WE," I'm referring to, numbnuts. As in "people who support Mac OS X in the enterprise." Now, go away, you miserable waste of carbon...
There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
Speaking of Panther CLI, has anybody had luck editing the DeviceSupport.drprofile to add unsupported optical burners? (like PatchBurn for 10.2). The XML is fairly self-documenting, but it seems to need to be compiled or something as the changes I make aren't picked up.
drtool is neat, and seems to do everything else for DiscRecording, but not this.
Buler?
My God, it's Full of Source!
OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
OK, I'm not a Java fanatic so I have no idea what these things are. What the heck is JBoss and what is it's supposed advantage?
Comment removed based on user account deletion
I've been a mac user for a long time, what is a command-line?
It's supposed to be a one-time choice.
That don't change just because the restore CDs let you break that part of the EULA.
Will the JBoss team be pleased when they get wind that Apple is releasing documentation for JBoss?
If I remember correctly, the server is free, but they earn money with the documentation. Are there any legal problems here that might arise?
It is fully explained there, complete with examples.