Judge Examines Microsoft Settlement Progress
Infonaut writes "The judge who presided over the settlement between Microsoft and the federal government may be starting to realize what a lot of people already know about Microsoft. The settlement was predicated on the belief that competitors would be able to license technology from Microsoft in order to get some relief from Microsoft's desktop OS monopoly. As Kollar-Kelly admitted, 'I think all of us had hoped for more agreements.' Now the judge is asking federal prosecutors to examine specifically why more licensing agreements have not been reached. I'm truly shocked that the settlement isn't turning out as planned, after the Justice Department so shrewdly rolled over when they had Microsoft over a barrel."
Without copyright, Microsoft would not be the monopoly that it is. They depend on copyright for nearly everything they do.
-Libertarian secular transhumanist
Who would fill the void? Their leading competitors have higher priorities than consumer satisfaction and industry cooperation, I'll bet.
Does mixing up standards again seem like a good idea? Plug and play ain't the prettiest but it's a damn sight better than trying to get things to work in the 80s used to be.
Justice doesn't always equal punishment. In business, sometimes it really is about letting the ends justify the means. I'd prefer Microsoft take a more relaxed stance towards Open Source and the like, sure, but I think the people in this process are showing great wisdom in not immediately jumping down Microsoft's throat. Stifling innovation is the quickest way to kill this industry.
Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
-- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.
Criminal violations include theft, fraud, assault, contempt of court, etc. If a company committed one of those violations, the CEO would be held personally responsible for it.
There are those who would contend M$'s assertions that windoze is a stable, secure, operating system constitute fraud.
As for theft, how about the large amounts of lost time spent patching, blue screening, recovering from patching, blue screening...?
I think we need to try and interest Jack Thompson in a class action suit.
Some days it's just not worth
chewing through my restraints.
Minor note of interest: The grandparent poster spectecjr is one Simon Cooke, a former Microsoft employee, and full-time Microsoft defender on all sorts of online media.
Oh, and him calling someone else a kook is too laughable to describe, as he has a rather kooky history too. Check out the Google USENET archives for some fun.
Mart
"I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
The government rolled over when George Bush became President. Can anyone think of one positive accomplishment of this President? I can't.
This all comes down to one thing. What is Microsofts business plan?
...
1. Control some software markets
2.
3. Profit!
"I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
Everybody respects a tough competitor nobody respects whiners.
Everybody respects someone with a grasp of grammar nobody respects fools.
"I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
Could you please say "Mozilla Firebird" or Moz-Firebird or some such. I kept thinking you were talking about the Firebird DBMS, and that your comments were addressed to Taco until I was passed by two posts.
I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.