Californian Court Fines Spammers $2 Million
afra242 writes "The BBC News has reported that a Californian court has fined a marketing firm $2m for spamming via email. This judgement was the first anti-spam ruling and the marketing firm were fines for sending out millions of unsolicited e-mails telling people how to spam. We're getting closer..." Other readers point to coverage of the judgement from the Associated Press (via SFGate) and from Reuters (via Yahoo!).
Oh ya.
Well, would you?
"where fines", or "were fined", should be "was fined"?
Perhaps: "This judgement was the first anti-spam ruling; the marketing firm was fined for sending out millions of unsolicited e-mails telling people how to spam. We're getting closer..."
is a little better?