Slashdot Mirror


FreeBSD to Celebrate 10 Year Anniversary in SF, CA

Dan writes "A long time ago, in a galaxy far far away...in the early part of 1993...the last 3 coordinators of the 'Unofficial 386BSD Patchkit' would go on to start the FreeBSD project that has grown to be used by millions of websites and installations around the world. Murray Stokely is talking about Jordan Hubbard, Nate Williams, and Rod Grimes. Looking for a catchy name, David Greenman suggested FreeBSD and it stuck. With the help of Walnut Creek CDROM, the first CDROM distribution, FreeBSD 1.0, was released in December of 1993."

3 of 103 comments (clear)

  1. Obligatory BSD Death Wish by saden1 · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    BSD is dead man. Time to switch to Linux.

    --

    -----
    One is born into aristocracy, but mediocrity can only be achieved through hard work.
  2. Re:Moderation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Two words, FUCK OFF.

  3. *BSD -- it's all over but the burial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait
    Sure, we all know that *BSD is a failure, but why? Why did *BSD fail? Once you get past the fact that *BSD is fragmented between a myriad of incompatible kernels, there is the historical record of failure and of failed operating systems. *BSD experienced moderate success about 15 years ago in academic circles. Since then it has been in steady decline. We all know *BSD keeps losing market share but why? Is it the problematic personalities of many of the key players? Or is it larger than their troubled personas?

    The record is clear on one thing: no operating system has ever come back from the grave. Efforts to resuscitate *BSD are one step away from spiritualists wishing to communicate with the dead. As the situation grows more desperate for the adherents of this doomed OS, the sorrow takes hold. An unremitting gloom hangs like a death shroud over a once hopeful *BSD community. The hope is gone; a mournful nostalgia has settled in. Now is the end time for *BSD.