Slashdot Mirror


Info Glut - Five Exabytes of Data Created in 2002

securitas writes "If you had any doubts that you are overwhelmed by the volume of information in your life, a new Berekley study (PDF) shows that five exabytes of data were created in 2002, twice the 1999 total. That's five million terabytes of data, or 500,000 Libraries of Congress, which works out to about 800 MB of data for each of the 6.3 billion people on the planet. Of note is that 92 percent of the new information was stored on magnetic media, which may create an interesting problem for historians and archaeologists of the future. The study was conducted by University of California-Berkeley's School of Information Management and Systems professors Peter Lyman and Hal Varian. More at CNet, Infoworld, ByteAndSwitch and The Register."

20 of 284 comments (clear)

  1. Yeah... by the_mad_poster · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...and most of it is still sitting in my Inbox at work right now.

    --
    Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
  2. Damn by Judg3 · · Score: 1, Funny

    That's a lot of porn. Though I think their stats are off a bit, as I have 800gb of porn, not mb. Oh well, better luck next year!

    --
    Looking for hardware (Currently need: Large Etch-a-Sketch) Have one? See my journal!
    1. Re:Damn by Carnildo · · Score: 3, Funny

      You've got a thousand times your allotment of porn! Think of all the poor people in Africa who you are depriving of their annual allowance!

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
  3. The report... by Lidless+Eye · · Score: 0, Funny

    IS IN PDF! Now we know who to blame...

  4. Dissertation by BWJones · · Score: 2, Funny

    a new Berekley study (PDF) shows that five exabytes of data were created in 2002,

    Shoot, it felt like my doctoral dissertation was responsible for at least 2 of those 5 exabytes. :-)

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
  5. No problem here. by FrankoBoy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Of note is that 92 percent of the new information was stored on magnetic media, which may create an interesting problem for historians and archaeologists of the future.

    Well, why won't they just print it ? Sheesh...

    1. Re:No problem here. by indianajones428 · · Score: 5, Funny


      So 122 Great Pyramids = 500,000 Libraries of Congress?

      Great, another conversion factor to remember...

      --
      When a thing has been said, and said well, have no scruple. Take it and copy it. --Anatole France
  6. Re:And about 1% was worthwhile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    And if you don't count all the troll and flamebait comments on Slashdot, we're down to 1 exabyte!

  7. Re:And about 1% was worthwhile by bcolflesh · · Score: 0, Funny

    There has to be a special section in that report on Nigerian email!

  8. that's a LoC per minute, almost. by sulli · · Score: 3, Funny
    525,600 minutes per year. Impressive.

    But if these data were recorded on floppies, and stacked up to the moon n times, how many VWs would it take to carry those floppies to the stack site?

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  9. Re:800 MB per person by Anonymous+Crowhead · · Score: 5, Funny

    I personally burned over 500 CDs last year

    Congrats, you balanced out 1 medium-sized tribe in Africa.

  10. AOL doom day. by twitter · · Score: 2, Funny
    I've got more than my share of data, enough to discard the 800MB or so that AOL likes to mail me. 800MB/person is not shocking when I think of all the CDs I've stumbled across in the field - literally grass fields in the midle of nowhere.

    It's a joke..

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  11. Re:Disk space is cheap - and other myths by borgdows · · Score: 1, Funny

    Of course, this never takes into account backup media and the whole backup infrastructure (anyone price decent commercial backup software recently?).

    take this :

    Real Men don't make backups. They
    upload it via ftp and let the world mirror it.

  12. Relevance? by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 2, Funny
    Of note is that 92 percent of the new information was stored on magnetic media, which may create an interesting problem for historians and archaeologists of the future.

    Not least for those historians who want to know what my Amazon.com session ID was on the day that my Runescape character hit mining level 33.

    --
    Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
  13. Re:And about 1% was worthwhile by kfg · · Score: 5, Funny

    "I wonder how much of that was duplicate data."

    3% was [AOL] Me Too! [/AOL] posts.

    1% was In Soviet Russia jokes.

    0.5% Profit!!!

    So I guess there was a fair amount of duplication.

    KFG

  14. Re:Let's get the standard jokes out of the way by NumLk · · Score: 3, Funny
    You forgot these jokes:

    I for one welcome our new data generating overlords!

    With all that data you'd think that my conne3^&#5$ATDT01[NO CARRIER]

    In Soviet Russia data generates YOU!

    Homer: I see they have the Internet on computers now.

    --
    Children in the backseats don't cause accidents. Accidents in the back seats cause children.
  15. Reminds me of this observation: by targo · · Score: 4, Funny

    5 billion files are created every day.
    3 billion of them will never be found again.
    Poor files...

  16. And what kind of data are we creating? by Pedrito · · Score: 2, Funny

    Of note is that 92 percent of the new information was stored on magnetic media, which may create an interesting problem for historians and archaeologists of the future.

    They fail to mention that also of note is that 99% of that informations is in the form of pr0n! That's a lot!

  17. Re:And about 1% was worthwhile by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I wonder how they count film too, as film is not digital medium did they MPEG2 it a la DVD, or take the raw footage from the cameras (as long as it wasn't a direct analog to analog transfer)... and what about photographs - did they count them and if so at the molecular level of the photo paper?

    I only glanced through the numbers, but couldn't find any place that said "for our purposes pictures are considered HxV resolution". For film (studio movies), they did say each frame was considered a picture and that sound contained a lot of data, but well again, I don't know how they sampled it.

    Maybe they just used "a picture is worth 1000 words". Hmm... no, at 5 characters an average word, that's only 5K per picture, way too low.

    --
    -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
  18. cat /dev/urandom > ~/foo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    does that count?

    Some days at my job I create gigs of test data every few minutes.