Slashdot Mirror


New Optical Chip Claims 8 Trillion Operations/sec.

Richard Finney writes "Lenslet is announcing the 'World's First Commercial Optical Processor.'. Reuters has the story here. The Inquirer has a cool graphic here on it. The processor is specified to run at a speed of 8 Tera (8,000 Giga) operations per second, one thousand times faster than any known DSP. When Lenslet releases its Enlight processor in a matter of weeks, a unit using the technology will be 1.7 centimetres high and measure 15 by 15 centimetres."

5 of 315 comments (clear)

  1. Picture by r_glen · · Score: 5, Informative

    There's a nice picture of the processor here

    1. Re:Picture by r_glen · · Score: 5, Informative

      Also, a demo video here

  2. Re:FYI by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 4, Informative

    I studied this subject in depth and happen to know 6 six physics professors who agree with me on the subject. And I don't agree with a thing you've said.

    To do anything at all with light, you need a material in with light beams can interact.
    Light will interact in almost any medium. Many kinds of optical gates have already been created.

    In this material, the speed at which electrons can change energy levels determine the speed.
    I'm not even sure what you are talking about here. There are no signal carrying electrons in an optical fiber - that's the point. And if you meant photons instead of electrons, then the photons aren't changing energy levels. If you look back through your physics book, that would corrospond to changing color, and has nothing to do with optical computing. It is the absence or presence of light that determines the on or off state. Not the voltage, as in a regular processor.

    In fact: the rise and fall time are determined by how fast you can (electronically) switch the light source on or off.
    If you are using an isolated optical gate with electronic converters surrounding it yes. But that would be senseless and no one does it. Everyhing inside an opticl processor is connected by light signals. Each optical gate interacts with other optical gates optically. And as time goes on, the memory and bus of these systems will also become optical. Already, there are many physical processes that do not need any optical-electronic conversion : especially cpu bound operations that fit into the cache.

    I don't beleive you have accurately grasped the concept of optical computing. If you have questions, please ask them. But don't assert your opinion as fact.

    --

    Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
  3. But think of the SETI@Home score... :) by Opiuman · · Score: 4, Informative

    Seriously though, basically this chip can do very quickly what the SETI@Home software does on PCs. Fast fourier transforms and the like... Think about completing a calculation unit every 30 seconds instead of 8 hours and 40 minutes. That is the ball park. I wonder if the precision will be the same.

  4. Re:FYI by QuantumFTL · · Score: 4, Informative

    They used to use regular electronic circuits to solve differential equations and similar problems too. They didn't get an exact solution, but they got a usable value. I think that's what you're talking about here.

    You're talking about old analog electronic computers... yeah those weren't very precise (one of the reasons they are no longer used).

    What I'm talking about is a little different. Those electronic ciruits would solve differential equations in the time domain (requiring a bit of time to compute) whereas these optical processors process information in the frequency domain (almost instantly, the bottlneck is as you say how fast they can moduate the light from an electronic signal).

    Frequency domain computing is fundamentally different from the time domain computing in that in time domain analog computers, tiny errors accumulate very rapidly. For instance, an operational amplifier that is used to perform an integration will have a small bias current which will slowly charge the integrating capactor(s), requiring the integration to be rezeroed every so often (at least every few seconds, if not many times a second). In frequency domain computation, the error is not accumulative like that. There is error, and it does add up, but its pretty much orthogonal (the error is spread throughout the frequency space, rather than adding up towards the end of the time space in a time domain computer).

    A really great article I found (this is the one I originally read back in 2001) is here. Anyone interested in the more technical side of the processor should read it. It explains why the processing is so fast (because it's essentially parallel rather than serial, along with being based on photons rather than electrons).

    That's where I got most of my information from, along with my optics and mathematical physics classes :)

    Cheers,
    Justin
    Disclaimer: I'm still a semester away from my BS in physics