Is CocoaTech Violating the GPL?
elliotj asks: "In the latest version of their Finder-replacement product, PathFinder CocoaTech has included a terminal feature based on sourcecode from the GPL'd iTerm. They have made available the classes they developed from the iTerm sources, but not all the sourcecode for their product. Since iTerm is GPL (and not LGPL), shouldn't they have to make the ENTIRE codebase available? This is being debated on their forums. If this is true, what can we do to get CocoaTech to open up the rest of the code?"
I thought it was because you were retarded
I hate GPL thieves!
Since it is supposed to be given out under the GPL, it is time for someone to hack it and give it away.
Prrof that Apple is TEH FAGGOT
...that being "who gives a shit?"
Like your anus by Steve Jobs if you use Apple products by choice.
> If you enjoy the internet -- namely browsing --
> thank your stars for the existence of Apple/NEXT..
Umm, say what? What the fuck did APPLE have to do with the "internet", you cum guzzling fanboy? I've been using the "net" since my BITNET days back in the early 80's, and I don't recall any particular contributions that have benefitted me, which came out of Apple...
I can't believe you keep buying that fucking shit. You're so much like those Windows using sheeple, it's amazing. Bend over and take another ass fucking, sheep!