Slashdot Mirror
Trouble Getting to SpamCop?
geekwench writes "SpamCop was apparently the victim of a recent DoS attack. A false complaint to their domain registrar led to all primary DNS information being pulled. The problem is now fixed, but there may still be access issues for the next couple of days as ISPs clear the old DNS information out of their caches. You can read about it here and here. (Sounds to me as if SpamCop is proving to be a good-sized thorn in the sides of a number of spammers.)"
I've been having trouble getting into Spamhaus too. The spammers are up to something.
As spammers and virus writers get more and more integrated. Spammers have the money, virus writers have the skills, together they will play havoc with the cornfields of the Internet.
In the natural world, something like 60% of all species are parasitical, and the war between parasites and hosts is one of the defining aspects of all nature. Sex, for instance, is a way of shuffling locks faster than parasites can evolve keys.
It seems inevitable that software and communications will have to develop similar kinds of defenses against what is an inevitable onslaught from the parasitical forces that have developed to snack on the soft underbelly of the Net.
Cybersex, anyone?
Ceci n'est pas une signature
When are we going to do a distributed blacklist so this @$#$!@#@$ $pammer$ can't pull this crap?
I didn't use the preview button, so get over it!!!!
Mike
The amount of spam I receive every day has clearly been steadily growing for the last few months. Looks like the spammers are winning the war by DoSing spam fighters and hiring mercenary hackers with 450000 trojaned systems.
The owls are not what they seem
I was a religious SpamCop user for awhile. You tattle to SpamCop on a spam you receive, it checks its various databases, and then notifies various network authorities of the problem.
Problem being, that several of the network authorities are huge megacorps where the complaints get filed with the rest of 98,000 or are spamhosts themselves.
I gave up in favor of SpamAssassin and Mozilla's spam filtering, which turned out to be far more effective.
Isn't effectiveness the whole reason eight-year-olds tattle in the first place? ("Billy hit me!" Billy gets in trouble. (And Tommy gets beaten up after school.)) Somehow, I don't think enough spammers got in trouble.
It's been reported that SpamCop is paying upwards to $30K / year for bandwidth as a direct cause of the continous DDOS attacks on it.
The spammers are doing everything they can to squeeze the anti-spammers out. They use frivolous lawsuits (aka Mark Felstein and his porn spamming backers) or DDOS attacks that either knock the anti-spam resources off completely or increase the costs so that no hobbyist can run them.
And while all this is going on, the law enforcement agencies are doing nothing to counter the clearly illegal acts of the spammers.
And ISPs are doing NOTHING to reduce the number of zombies on their networks. So the DDOS attacks continue.
Nice going.
It's only a matter of time when someone (Al Queda?) will use the zombie network for something that will truly be noticed.
Proletariat of the world, unite to kill spammers
I'll tell you why: they are not numerous enough. I'm the abuse mailbox handler for a well-known company that is disliked on and off line. Out of a 5-million-address mailing, I get maybe 12 complaints. Management does not care to alter anything about our "customer retention management" system. In fact, with only 12 complaints our of 5 million emails, they think we're doing pretty damn good, and so do I.
We do the following:
1. Opt-out only. You do business with us, you're on the list and have to taken yourself off of it to stop getting our mailings. There is no choice to opt-out at time of purchase, no choice to omit your email address.
2. Sell your address to our partners. Our contracts with our partners requires us to collect addresses when we make a sale for them, and pass the address lists along.
3. Pass off opting out of partners' lists to our partners.
(We spell all this out in the online Terms of Service which is displayed before a customer makes a purchase. People still buy).
Still, with all these "bad practices" in place, we only get a dozen complaints out of several million spams sent. We're on AOL's whitelist of approved spammers^Wmarketers whose mailings bypass their spam filters. We're on other ISP whitelists, too. If we get a Spamcop complaint, I dutifully click on the link in the notice, check "account terminated" and that's the end of it. But with only a handful of them each week, I can take care of the Abuse mailbox in less than a hour a week. Anti-spammers have had no adverse effect on us in the four years we've been doing it this way.
Second, on their pages, they have at the top a recommendation for a specific web hosting company, presumably the one they use--this isn't a banner ad, but rather an ad written right into their HTML, so it sure looks like it is their personal recommendation for web hosting. When I was looking for a new hosting company for my site, I wanted to find one that was not soft on spam, so that I would not have to worry about ending up in SPEWS, and figured that the one SpamCop uses would have to be good. Checked out their plans, and they were good. I was ready to sign up, but decided it would be dumb not to at least Google a bit...and I found that that hosting company does NOT have a good reputation in the anti-spam community!
You'd think one sure-fire way to find a white-hat ISP would be to use the one that a major anti-spam site recommends, so this was quite a shock.