Slashdot Mirror


Spammer DDoS-By-Virus On spamhaus.org

McDutchie writes "Steve Linford of Spamhaus announced in a press release that the latest Wintel virus, W32/Mimail-E, was created by spammers for the specific purpose of DDoS'ing Spamhaus, Spamcop, and SPEWS. It's becoming more and more clear that the spambags are the ones behind the recent mess with the Windows viruses. They must really be getting desperate."

16 of 568 comments (clear)

  1. DDoS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder if this will be quickly followed by a press release on being slashdotted..? The world's friendliest DDoS attack..

    Chris, taffie down under..

  2. Could someone please make the argument... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    ...that the death penalty would be inappropriate for these people? I sure can't see why it would be.

    1. Re:Could someone please make the argument... by Analysis+Paralysis · · Score: 3, Funny

      Surely it would be more appropriate to force them to take an overdose of their own viagra? Sorry, v1agra.

    2. Re:Could someone please make the argument... by philbert26 · · Score: 2, Funny
      \begin{tongueInCheek}
      The death penalty, according to the liberals, is no deterrent because if you are crazy enough to kill, you won't be deterred by the threat of execution. Fair enough, but that's not going to be the case with spam. A few spammer executions would tilt the risk-benefit calculation hugely against spamming, thus eliminating the problem and saving millions of dollars (which will help the economy and therefore improve standards of living and therefore improve life expectancy -- thus saving lives).

      Next up, the death penalty for people who stuff bubble gum in coin slots so I can't buy my bus tickets... \end{tongueInCheek}

  3. This oughtta help by _LFTL_ · · Score: 5, Funny

    W32/Mimail-E, was created by spammers for the specific purpose of DDoS'ing Spamhaus, Spamcop, and SPEWS.

    And in phase two of the attacks spammers craftily create stories containing links to the target spam lists and post them on slashdot. LFTL

  4. Great News! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is great news!

    Now we're once step closer to linking spam to al Qaeda. These viruses are terrorist actions, and are more demonstrably more dangerous even than Iraq's nukes!

    Once we somehow link spammers to September 11, we can invade them (or maybe just throw them in jail where the other inmates can do the "invading").

  5. evil spammers getting it slashdotted... by auzy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, the guy behind this article is obviously a spammer.. its a really smart idea to slashdot a site which is getting DDOS'ed... Well, I'm wondering what would have been more damage.. the worm or the slashdotting

  6. My evil plan for spam. by gad_zuki! · · Score: 4, Funny

    First get a corporate shield, an S-corp can be had for as little as $100 in most states. This will protect your personal assets from a lawsuit.

    Get a bulk mailer and email harvester and sell "Placebon the Herbal Viagra." Get a credit card processing account (or maybe just paypal) from a bank.

    Email a million people.

    Get ~5,000 orders.

    Charge $19.99

    Send them a .40 bottle of vitamin C with a little sticker that says "Placebo you bought from a spammer, dumbass. Cure wait ails ya."

    You profit. They get burned. Everyone wins. For the moral people, think of it as your personal war against scurvy.

  7. No defense against idiots by activewire · · Score: 3, Funny

    this virus spreads itself by email a ZIP attachment which contains EXE that must be run, of course its Windows only.

    I would love a way to identify IP address of all idiots who contract this virus, just to be sure my AOL/RoadRunner/Verizon netblock blacklists are complete.

  8. Re:Spammers and the future of E-Mail by The+Grassy+Knoll · · Score: 1, Funny

    >only mails from "thrustworthy" origin

    There's no need to even comment on this typo!

    LOL!

    .

    --
    They will never know the simple pleasure of a monkey knife fight
  9. Re:I like this one better... by McDutchie · · Score: 2, Funny

    FWIW, I linked to that thread in the original submission but it was edited out. (Which is good for you - enjoy the karma. ;) )

  10. If the Virus doent kill them... by Pope+Raymond+Lama · · Score: 2, Funny

    Slashdot will.

    There are few things I can think of more Homer-Simpson-ish than post a slashdot link to certains sites to tell the world they are being DoSed.

    --
    -><- no .sig is good sig.
  11. Re:Two part plan by Mikey-San · · Score: 1, Funny

    Maybe it's a 1-2 punch type approach.
    Step A - release virus to DDoS on blacklist maintainers ...(DNS/blacklist/etc has to be re-routed until virus passes)
    Step B - while blacklists are down, send out massive spam campaign or more virus-type spam

    Step C . . . Profit?

    --
    Mikey-San
    Karma: +Eleventy billion (mostly affected by watching Celebrity Jeopardy)
  12. TOOL IS YOU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Don't quote unless you understand it. You don't, therefore you shouldn't.

  13. Re:unfortunately untouchable by Mr+Guy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Besides, compared to the bleeding hearts in our justice system, "overseas" is often where you WANT to see them persecuted. Lets all just take a moment to pray they are in Singapore...

  14. Here's how more laws and regulation will stop spam by mabu · · Score: 3, Funny

    1. Print out all the new laws and proposed regulations; bind them into a big, thick book.

    2. Get some competent network admins (who are obviously nowhere near any government cyber-crime unit) and can easily track down the source of the spam and worms.

    3. Go to the perpetrators home or residence.

    4. Beat the perpetrator over the head with the book of laws.

    The more laws we pass, the heavier the book becomes and the more brain damage it will do. Considering the trend our leaders have in thinking more laws will stop this when the existing laws aren't being enforced, the only reasonable solution is to use the actual laws themselves as some form of blunt instrument.