Slashdot Mirror


New Napster Off To A Solid Start

Anonymous Superhero writes "From Wired magazine Napster 2.0 has a sleek design and makes exploring new music a pleasure. The most nagging problem? The confusing licensing issues. A review by Katie Dean." I haven't tried it yet - still using the iTunes store.

10 of 593 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Portability by hethatishere · · Score: 5, Informative

    It doesn't use the common MP3 format. Instead it uses the more proprietary and stiflying WMA format. Which, in my experience has proven inferior to every other format available. (MP3, MP3Pro, Ogg, AAC, etc) Though, to it's credit it does have a wider range of device support than Apple's AAC, but it was a mistake to not go with MP3 which would have provided even greater support and better quality.

    --
    Something intelligent here.
  2. Re:monthyl liscence? by Llywelyn · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.napster.com/terms.html

    If you are on their monthly service you keep the music only so long as you subscribe to their service and cannot burn it (or I think transfer it to a music player) without paying the additional charge.

    It also reports how many times you've played each track to headquarters.

    --
    Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
  3. iTMS has already worked out the kinks... by Chief+Typist · · Score: 5, Informative

    From the article: I look forward to an even better digital music experience as the licensing hitches are resolved.

    And that's the beauty of the Apple solution: all of the licensing hitches have already been worked out. Consumers want predictability, and iTunes is the only one that provides it now.

  4. Ease of use by reptilicus · · Score: 5, Informative

    The big problem with Napster (and BuyMusic for that matter), and the reason iTunes surpasses both of them: Ease of Use. I don't want to have to read the fine print on every single song. I just want to find it and grab it:

    "Despite its flexibility, the service can also be confusing. Some songs in the Napster library can only be streamed, while others are only available for a 99-cent download, even if you're paying for the streaming service. Which songs fall into each category isn't clearly spelled out. Some users are liable to think they are signing up for unlimited access to the Napster library, only to find out that some tracks must be purchased separately."

    " I was listening to Lucinda Williams' album Car Wheels on a Gravel Road when I ran into a glitch. I could hear all of "Lake Charles," but only 30 seconds of "I Lost It," a song from the same album. It turns out "I Lost It" was only available if I opted for the a la carte feature. I either had to buy the track for 99 cents or be content hearing just 30 seconds of it. What a pain."

  5. Different classes of songs hidden until you join by Smack · · Score: 5, Informative

    That is my biggest complaint. I decided to sign up for their premium service for a few months, since I was quitting eMusic anyway so the net cost was negligible. Once you join, many songs' icons change from "Buy song" to "Buy only", which means you can't stream or download them without paying $1. OTOH, there is a bunch of stuff that is streaming only. (For example, the Pet Sounds Sessions by the Beach Boys.) I don't think this is made sufficiently clear before you sign up, although I'm sure they would argue it's in the fine print somewhere.

    Also, just some more info on the tracks you can download on the $9.99 unlimited plan. If you view the file info in Windows Media Player, they are tagged in the DRM as "no transfer to portable", "no burn to CD", and with 6 week play expirations. Presumably that is renewed automatically if you keep up the subscription.

  6. Head to head comparison by nucal · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is a recent review from John Fried who compared the different sites head-to-head

  7. Re:Yummy by TintinX · · Score: 5, Informative

    Seems they've thought of this.
    Upon installation you are asked to supply your connection speed for streaming purposes.
    The maximum available is 96 so stream capturing isn't really an option.

  8. Re:I haven't tried it yet, either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Puretracks, is a canadian legal music service.

  9. Re:Anyone know of a CD-R emulator? That'd work... by Luscious868 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Use a CD-RW. That is what I do when I buy a music on iTuens and burn it to a CD. iTunes will burn track information on the CD so when I rip the CD back to MP3's none of the track info (Artist, Song Title, CD Title, etc.) is lost. When I'm finised I erase the CD-RW so it can be used again.

  10. Re:I haven't tried it yet, either by CastrTroy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually, Accoring to the currency converter I use, it's 33.75 USD. You americans should stop being so arrogant and notice what's happening with your currency. Click here for a nice graph of what's happening with the Canadian Dollar

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.