Investigating Bias In Videogame Review Sites
jvm writes "We've all read comments that some videogame sites are allegedly biased for
or against some games, consoles, or companies. So, Curmudgeon Gamer has investigated whether bias can be seen in the review scores
over several games on each console. The review sites in question are GameSpot, GameSpy, and IGN, each of whom are compared to the game
review averages on GameRankings.
Additionally, a selection of review scores for crossplatform games are
examined. While solid conclusions are difficult to draw and improvements can
admittedly be made, perhaps people will find these results interesting to examine and
discuss."
On Gamespot, they list GTA3 for the PC at a score of 9.3 (not bad since the PS2 version got 9.6). But lo and behold, the reader's score(s) drop the score by .3 points for the PS2 version and an even harsher .8 points. If you're concerned about small bias (a couple people picking 1's) : 19578 readers voted on the PS2 version and 2454 readers voted on the PC version. Hard to sway that kind of majority..
However, vice versa this also happens : .2 away from the much coveted 9.0 spot.
Gamespot (again) lists GTA2 for the PC at a fairly low 6.8 (OUCH compared to GTA3's score) and the PS1 version at 6.9. But insert reader reviews and GTA2 for the PC shoots up a whole 1.4 points and the PS1 version almost breaks acceptable levels with an insane 1.9 points! Nearly 2.0 whole points, and just
Keeping this in mind, its VERY easy to see how jaded or how harshly the public can "vote" when it comes to their favorite games. Throw a "reader review" system on Slashdot for programs between Windows, Linux, and Macs; and Windows will be lucky to get a score of 1.2 .
P.S. If you want to check the scores, use the GameFinder on the left sidebar on Gamespot.