FCC Adopts Broadcast Flag Scheme

sbrown writes "Today, the FCC adopted the MPAA's "broadcast flag" scheme, requiring that digital broadcast receivers and anything that connects to them is now required to check for the presence of the flag and apply DRM restrictions to its outputs. Currently, no such restrictions are required by law. EFF Staff Technologist Seth Schoen comments: 'The FCC has decided that the way to get Americans to adopt digital TV is to make it cost more and do less.' The unusual aspect of the FCC's ruling is that the restrictions are applied even though the input signals are completely unencrypted. Thus, this technology regulation goes beyond even the scope of the DMCA. "Instead of a scheme that actually protects content, the Flag forces manufacturers to go back to the drawing board and make all their devices monitor for Flagged content," said Public Knowledge Senior Technology Counsel Mike Godwin."

sbrown continues: "However, the FCC isn't changing the format of DTV broadcasts at all. As a result, DTV equipment bought right now will continue to work forever, even though future-generation equipment will have fewer features. (For example, a current-generation DTV tuner card like this one can save any DTV broadcast as an MPEG-2 file on your hard drive. But that feature would become illegal in DTV cards after 2005.)"

And The Importance of notes "Note that the facts of the release include 'The broadcast flag protects consumers' use and enjoyment of broadcast video programming. The flag does not restrict copying in any way.'" CBS/Viacom says 'Today's decision by the FCC is an historic step forward for consumers.' The decision was unanimous, with detailed statements by the commissioners here, in PDF:

• Powell Press Statement
• Abernathy Statement
• Copps Statement
• Adelstein Statement."

Comments

Re:Suits!

[datawar]

Jesus H. Christ, you are an idiot. I feel that so much, I'm not even going to AC this post.

YOU. ARE. AN. IDIOT. Maybe retarded as well. Maybe you just don't understand freedom of expression. I have no idea... but whatever it is, you can fuckin' wear your fuckin' suit, and tie, and suck Bush's cock while you're at it.

I was even going to write an intelligent reply, but on the second thought, this article is waaaay off the front page, so no one will ever bother to read it or mod it.

You clearly don't understand what's wrong with the system, and if you think suits and ties are gonna change it, you've got your head so far up your loose asshole that you will soon cease to exist in this reality.