Slashdot Mirror


Tanker Truck Shut Down Via Satellite

unassimilatible writes "Satellite Security Systems, in cooperation with the California Highway Patrol and InterState Oil Company, demonstrated the first wireless remote shutdown of a fully loaded, moving gas tanker truck. Described as "a viable solution to the challenge of controlling rogue hazardous waste vehicles that could pose a threat to homeland security," satellite communications were used to disable the truck in seconds, 530 miles from the demonstration site. But that's not all. California Assembly Bill (AB) 575 (PDF link) would require truck disabling devices, global positioning or other 'location reporting systems' on all hazardous material haulers. With all of the police pursuits in California, can mandatory GPS and disabling devices in all vehicles be far away?"

3 of 529 comments (clear)

  1. Hazardous Waste is a far cry from everyone by Ececheira · · Score: 4, Informative
    Trucks that get Hazmat certification already are very highly regulated, far more so than normal trucks and passenger cars.


    Requiring them to have onboard GPS with remote deactivation makes sense here, and I don't think that just because hazmat tucks have it that it will be forced upon everyone. Commercial traffic, especially hazmat, has far less 4th amendment protections than your average joe.

  2. Um, how is this the first? by Llewrend · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm the sysadmin at a trucking company and we've had kill switches on engines as well as gps tracking for a long time. Most major carriers do, if not for hazmat, for pharmacuticals and baby formula. In fact, we have flowthrough to our EDI system so that our customers can track thier own loads if they want to and stop calling us about it. Anyone ever heard of AIRIQ?

    --
    -- Please don't use a sig that makes me hate you, do that in your post
  3. Re:So much for homeland security by velo_mike · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually if you want to look it up, most of the erosion of rights like this started with the clinton administration. Bush is merely has been keeping the status quo

    Now I'm not debating the erosion of rights under clinton, but let's not pretend that he started the ball rolling.

    Remember Regan's "war on some drugs" which has given us asset forfeiture , drug tests, mandatory minimum's and long jail substances for users (violating the 4th ammendment). Remember also that Ed Meese, Regan's attorney general,tried valiantly to outlaw pornography and other "filth".

    --

    At the bottom of the endless pile of paper work which characterizes all regulation lies a gun.
    Alan Greenspan