Star Wars Original Trilogy Gets DVD Release Date

Angry Black Man writes "The Digital Bits is reporting that there is finally some official information from Lucasfilm regarding the release of the Star Wars OT (episodes IV, V, and VI) on DVD. The movies are coming to DVD in September of 2004. The animated series of Clone Wars shorts appearing soon on the Cartoon Network will also be released on DVD, possibly before the end of this year. The teaser campaign for Episode III will begin in January of 2005, leading up to the May theatrical release. Finally... Episode III will hit DVD in November of 2005."

Comments

Re:Nifty.

[Liselle]

Have people forgotten how George Lucas works? How many VHS releases of the flipping original trilogy did we have? Keep an eye out for endless special editions and reworks until the day you die, conveniently spaced out and with enough extra materials to keep you coming back every time.

On another note, I'm glad to hear he finally buried the hatchet over that damned Laserdisc business.

Re:HAN SHOT FIRST!!!

[NMerriam]

In the Star Wars, Han Solo kills Greedo in the Cantina while Greedo is holding a gun on him (Greedo is a bounty hunter trying to shake down Han for money he owes Jabba the Hut). Han shoots him under the table.

This is, of course, perfectly in character for a scoundrel and smuggler who has to get by in the criminal underworld -- if he didn't shoot Greedo, he'd have been killed (or worse).

During the "enhancements" that Lucas made to the movies a few years ago they added in a quick laser blast from Greedo so that he shoots first, because Han Solo is a "hero" who would never shoot someone except in self-defense.

Not only is it stupid for characterization reasons, it also looks stupid because Greedo has been holding a gun 6 inches away from Han's face for the past few minutes and then misses by about 3 feet when he pulls the trigger.

It was just a pointless change that represents in a fraction of a second of film everything stupid Lucas has done over the past 20 years to diminish the work that he was once so respected for.

Re:Nifty.

[Mark_in_Brazil]

Stevie, not wanting to kill his own tech, never released his male-Lara Croft movies on DVD, and got his good pal Georgie to keep his space opera off as well.

Setting aside the lameness of trying to look cool by calling Spielberg "Stevie" and referring to the Indiana Jones movies as "male-Lara (sic) Croft movies," there's still a big hole in this theory: the Indiana Jones movies were a joint project between Lucas and Spielberg, and were more Lucas's than they were Spielberg's.
All three films were written by Lucas (and others, but not Spielberg) and directed by Spielberg, with Lucas as executive producer and as an uncredited editor. If you consider the original Star Wars trilogy to be Lucas's, it's not that hard to consider the Indiana Jones series his too, since 2/3 of the original Star Wars trilogy had non-Lucas directors. As with the Star Wars movies, Lucas was the main creative force behind the Indiana Jones movies. He just used a director for the Indiana Jones movies who is more famous than Kershner and Marquand and, much as it pains me to say it, is a better director than Lucas (but is still highly overrated).
Maybe you noticed that Lucasfilm's logo appears at the beginning of the movies, but Amblin Entertainments's does not (nor does that of Dreamworks SKG). That's because the Indiana Jones movies were Lucasfilm productions and Spielberg was only involved as the director. That's why George Lucas had the rights to make The Young Indiana Jones Chronicles (released on VHS as The Adventures of Young Indiana Jones) without Spielberg. It's also why Lucasfilm made a deal with Disney to develop the "Indiana Jones Adventure" attraction (and "Star Tours--" I believe it was a single deal for developing attractions based on both the Star Wars movies and the Indiana Jones movies) without Spielberg being involved.
Anyway, getting back to the point, it seems to me the decision about the release of the Indiana Jones movies would be at least as much Lucas's as Spielberg's, and probably a lot more. So that kinda blows away the theory that Spielberg was holding off the release of "his" Indiana Jones movies on DVD because of a large investment in a rival compact videodisc standard.

Did I just fall for a troll? I hope not.

--Mark