Slashdot Mirror


The Best of What's New From Popular Science

Wrathie writes ""The top 100 technological innovations of 2003, from aviation to defibrillation, GPS to Wi-Fi, rotary to rockets. The year and the gear that was." This article from Popular Science magazine is quite extensive."

8 of 118 comments (clear)

  1. Dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    I rate this dupe as one of the worst inventions of 2003...

    1. Re:Dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      Along with Itunes and Micro(lets put and $ here)$oft.

  2. The Worst of whats new : Gnome 2.4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Ever since Gnome 2.4 was released, I have found more and more gnome zealots who MUST absolutely advocate GNOME at every possible moment. Here is a guide to some of their claims, and what they really mean.

    Unlike KDE, Gnome is free
    Translation : GPL is freerer than LGPL. LGPL allows corporations like Novell and Sun to have propeitry forks and lock away their changes from the user. Now that Novell has taken over Ximian you can expect Gnome to get put under corpirate lock. With KDE you have the choice, you either PAY UP or pay with your source code.

    Nautilus is much better than konqueror.
    Wrong, if your using nautilus for anything more than a simple finder clone you can forget it. No split screen, no ioslaves and forget about being able to have a decent file dialog, not to forget that it is as unstable as hell and is STILL slow on >3 Ghz machines.

    Gnome is easier to use
    Yep, nothing like using gconf-editor to edit all except the most trivial of settings.

    Gnome has eye candy
    Yes, my pirated Win32 fonts with the patent infringing font renderer. Bit stream vera sans looks like Tahoma put through a shreadder! Of course I still reboot into windows to print using "Comic Sans MS.

    Gnome has a new web browser
    Yawb! Along with Galeon, mozilla, thunderbird, konqueror, atlantis, lynx, netscape and w3m. Yes I need another browser! Not to mention that its got a religiously offensive name and it dosen't allow bookmark folders. It also crashes like a crazy! Apple chose khtml for a REASON! its stable and light!

    Gnome is themeable
    Yep, choose from High, low and medium contrast, default, and clean ice. Wan't to change the colour scheme? USE GCONF NOOB, plus if you complain about it we will tell you to fuck off and go back to Windows or KDE.

    Gnome has multimedia framework
    Its a kludge of esd combined with broken xine libraries. No wonder it crashes all the time and dosen't work on 95% of video files

    Gnome allows mac like operation.
    x86 compatible 1 button mice are almost impossible to find, and it dosen't copy the whole macbar concept. Not to even mention their auto apply implementation is broken and dangerous! Plus if they did actually come anywhere close to copying the Mac the C&D letters would come flying up their asses.

    Gnome is GNU software.
    gnu/Yay, gnu/gnome gnu/for gnu/my gnu/debian gnu/linux gnu/500mhz /gnu/celeron gnu/packard gnu/bell gnu/box.

    Inspired by the gentoo translate-o-matic.

  3. they missed one.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    They missed the "Cmdr Taco Electrified Corrective Butt Plug..."

    I thought that one was pretty cool......

  4. Re:bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    In Soviet Russia, Current News Prints You.

  5. Re:Invisible WMDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    You can't post unAmerican things like that on Slashdot! I give you 10 minutes of fame before you are modded as -1 Flamebait.

    Bush was chosen by God to be our leader. You must accept what he says without question.

    Personally, I think evil Iraqis hid the weapons of mass destruction up Jessica Lynch's bum.

  6. Re:Invisible WMDs by Richard+Allen · · Score: -1, Troll
    It continually amazes me that at Slashdot, a post is listed as "offtopic" if it is a statement promoting a conservative viewpoint, and "funny" when it promotes a liberal viewpoint.

    Second, it amazes me that the general public still believes that there was no WMD program in Iraq. They believe the lies from the media. The following excerpt is from the David Kay report which ABC titled "No Weapons Found Yet".

    Let me just give you a few examples of these concealment (by Iraq) efforts, some of which I will elaborate on later:

    A clandestine network of laboratories and safehouses within the Iraqi Intelligence Service that contained equipment subject to UN monitoring and suitable for continuing CBW research.

    A prison laboratory complex, possibly used in human testing of BW agents, that Iraqi officials working to prepare for UN inspections were explicitly ordered not to declare to the UN.

    Reference strains of biological organisms concealed in a scientist's home, one of which can be used to produce biological weapons.

    New research on BW-applicable agents, Brucella and Congo Crimean Hemorrhagic Fever (CCHF), and continuing work on ricin and aflatoxin were not declared to the UN.

    Documents and equipment, hidden in scientists' homes, that would have been useful in resuming uranium enrichment by centrifuge and electromagnetic isotope separation (EMIS).

    A line of UAVs not fully declared at an undeclared production facility and an admission that they had tested one of their declared UAVs out to a range of 500 km, 350 km beyond the permissible limit.

    Continuing covert capability to manufacture fuel propellant useful only for prohibited SCUD variant missiles, a capability that was maintained at least until the end of 2001 and that cooperating Iraqi scientists have said they were told to conceal from the UN.

    Plans and advanced design work for new long-range missiles with ranges up to at least 1000 km -- well beyond the 150 km range limit imposed by the UN. Missiles of a 1000 km range would have allowed Iraq to threaten targets through out the Middle East, including Ankara, Cairo, and Abu Dhabi.

    Clandestine attempts between late-1999 and 2002 to obtain from North Korea technology related to 1,300 km range ballistic missiles -- probably the No Dong -- 300 km range anti-ship cruise missiles, and other prohibited military equipment.

    In addition to the discovery of extensive concealment efforts, we have been faced with a systematic sanitization of documentary and computer evidence in a wide range of offices, laboratories, and companies suspected of WMD work. The pattern of these efforts to erase evidence -- hard drives destroyed, specific files burned, equipment cleaned of all traces of use -- are ones of deliberate, rather than random, acts. For example, (and I'll let it go at that)

    http://abcnews.go.com/sections/World/WorldNewsToni ght/david_kay_statement031002-1.html

    I'm sure I'll get an "Offtopic" for this ... but I need to make my point.

  7. Re:Invisible WMDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Let me get this straight... you're a rambling idiot?