Slashdot Mirror


Orbdev Files US Federal Suit Over Asteroid Claim

chongo writes "Orbital Development has filed legal action against the United States by filing a Complaint for Declaratory Judgment in Federal Court. After NASA's NEAR probe landed on the asteroid 433 Eros, Gregory W. Nemitz, who claims to have owned the asteroid since the 3rd of March 2000, sent NASA an $20 invoice for the first 100 years of parking and storage fees. NASA told him to "pound sand". OrbDev's Eros Project seeks to promote their ludicrous ideas about property rights in space."

3 of 733 comments (clear)

  1. Re:We must establish private property in outerspac by whig · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The right to own property is the foremost right of every person and should be defended above all these other "rights"...

    Thank you Ayn Rand.

    Now let's get real. Property is not inherent. Moreover, the subject of what can and cannot be property is a limited one; slavery is a form of property that was once legally recognized but is no longer in most parts of the world.

    What is inherent is life and liberty. Working from these one can derive certain forms of legitimate property, i.e., a presumed legal right to exclusive possession of things one creates, lest he or she be deprived of the labor (life and liberty interest) invested in its creation.

    Now tell me, sir, when and how did you make the asteroid you now claim to own?

    --
    Peace and love, y'all
  2. Re:Markers? by chill · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Besides, even if he did "own" it, does the paltry price he is charging just a sign that he's only trying to be a pain in NASA's ass?

    Nope. I bet he's trying to get a gov't agency to "recognize" his claim by paying the invoice.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  3. International treaty by igny · · Score: 5, Insightful
    AGREEMENT GOVERNING THE ACTIVITIES OF STATES ON THE MOON AND OTHER CELESTIAL BODIES(1979) is more appropriate here.

    From Article 1

    1. The provisions of this Agreement relating to the moon shall also apply to other celestial bodies within the solar system, other than the earth, except in so far as specific legal norms enter into force with respect to any of these celestial bodies.
    From Article 11
    3. Neither the surface nor the subsurface of the moon, nor any part thereof or natural resources in place, shall become property of any State, international intergovernmental or non-governmental organization, national organization or non-governmental entity or of any natural person.
    --
    In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra