Slashdot Mirror
New Animated Dr. Who Series
smak writes "To celebrate the doctor's fourtieth anniversary, the BBC and Cosgrove Hall Films are webcasting a fully-animated adventure starring Richard E. Grant. You can watch the first episode of Scream of the Shalka and new episodes will be launched every Thursday. Enjoy." It requires Flash 4, but also looks pretty damn cool.
Who is Ann Coulter?
I, for one, welcome the return of our long-scarved TARDIS-riding overlords, even if it is in cartoon form, and would like to remind them that as a modded-down Slashdot troll, I could be very useful in gathering moderators to toil in your Dalek-mines.
It made me laugh.
Is it just me or does Flash run very slow in OS X?
9 steps to greasing your anus for Yoda Doll Insertion!
All in a days work with a yoda figurine rammed up your ass.
I HAVE A GREASED UP YODA DOLL SHOVED UP MY ASS!
y______________________________YODA_ANUS
o_________________.'_:__`.________________y
d____________.-.'`.__;___.'`.-.___________o
a___________/_:____\_;__/____;_\__________d
s_,'__""--.:__;".-.";:_:".-.":__;.--""__`,a
e_:'_`.t""--.._'/@.`;___',@\`_..--""j.'_`;s
x______`:-.._J_'-.-'L___`--_'_L_..-;'_____e
________"-.___;__.-"__"-.__:___.-"________x
y____________L_'_/.------.\_'_J___________y
o_____________"-.___"--"___.-"____________o
d______________.l"-:_TR_;-";._____________d
a_________.-j/'.;__;""""__/_.'\"-.________a
s_______v.'_/:`._"-.:_____.-"_.';__`.v____s
e____.-"__/_;__"-._"-..-"_.-"__:____"-.___e
x_.+"-.__:_:______"-.__.-"______;-.____\__x
_v;_\__`.;_;____________________:_:_"+._;_
y_:__;___;_;____________________:_;__:_\:_y
o_;__:___;_:____________________;:___;__:_o
d:_\__;__:__;__________________:_;__/__::_d
Because of Yoda's attitude, I usually don't respond to his perversions, but this time I'll make an exception. For starters, the nicest thing that can be said about Yoda's lackeys is that they are goofy insurrectionists out to demonstrate an outright hostility to law enforcement. Already, some piteous Neanderthals have begun to fund a vast web of uncontrollable vagabonds, combative slackers, and naive malodorous-types, and with terrifying and tragic results. What tracts will follow from their camp is anyone's guess. Think about that for a moment. Simply put, every morning Yoda asks himself, "How can I foo
AOL News [aol.com] is doing a follow-up article [aol.com]
Click Here [aol.com] to see it
AOL News is doing a follow-up article
Click Here to see it
AOL News is doing a follow-up article
Click Here to see it
Could they have sued to stop the Matrix sequels?
;p They're still better than Episode One.
I'm kidding
-- INTX Grouch. http://www.midnightblue.net
I just hope they include the weirding modules from the books in this series.
Bored with mindless groupthink ?
Had enough with Slashdot's unethical support for advertisers ?
If so, we invite you to join the jihad against Slashdot at www.anti-slash.org [anti-slash.org]. We demand a full acknowledgment and apology from the editorial staff for their crimes against the community. Until then, we will take whatever action is necessary to discredit Slashdot as a reputable geek news site.
Our tools:
- Database Tool -
A huge searchable database of old Score:4 and Score:5 posts ready for
reposting. Gain karma at your will. Then, use your mod points and karma
bonus to cause mayhem.
- Browsing Tool -
Browse Slashdot through our special tool to alert other brothers in Jihad
to subversive posts worthy of moderation. Also integrates with the
database tool for quick karma whoring.
- Mail Tool - create
fake email accounts for creating new Slashdot accounts for jihad
operations with ease.
- Bait and Switch Mirror
Tool - Use this to mirror a Slashdotted site. After a certain amount
of time (to let the mods push it up to Score:5), it switches to displaying
goatse.cx or your favorite disgusting image.
Join the jihad today!What the hell is up with having skycraper ads on here? It looks like hell, slashdot has always been ugly, but is rapidly approaching the kind of ugly that makes you stay away for good. Do you people even care what the site looks like? Please, have someone develope a new slashdot that is not built on 1997 standards. Please...the site is so damn ugly, yuck.
What if time didn't really flow forward at all? What if it jumped around unsequentially with no pattern. Just events occuring for us to put a time stamp onto, to make us feel like something in this world is happening, when nothing is happening at all. What if we just moved around without the hindrance of what we call "time". All time seems to be is a rationalization of immense movement of the universe and its assets, based on a loose interpretation of a pattern being formed that it follows. This pattern called time. What if there was no pattern? Just things happening. Religion would say it's God that makes things happen, and makes it so. We cannot understand it because our minds are bound to a pattern that all things we experience must be sifted through, called rationalization. But what if we simply threw away this pattern. Just simply look at the events occurring around you, knowing that God had a reason or maybe that things just happen for no reason at all. You cannot ever put a halter on water. Time is a weak attempt at this. The truth is, that the real time, is un-harnessable and incomprehensible. We must only swim through the water, and not try to put a halter on it, to control it. Time is infinite, and unbounded. The true time, that is. Not the time in our minds. When we think time is always the same speed, that is true. One second is always 1.0 seconds long, and so on, but if we are simply interpretting events like I said, who says the events we assume to be happening at an exact predictable constant interval, are not slowing or accelerating in relation to the next system of time? Maybethat is called a dimension. But dimensions in that case would only be division of the universe and all average out to be a single value. Maybe this calue is the interval at which time flows at in our, and every dimension, based on our interpretation of events happening within out dimension. Therefore I think it would caused the destruction of all dimensions if one dimension collided with another, by attempting to rationalize each other's frame of reference. Maybe this is what Einstein meant when he said the universe would be destroyed if we were to break the lightspeed barrier. The light barrier, I reason then, must be the edge of our dimension, and if we attempted to break out of this dimension, the second dimension would either be destroyed trying to find an equilibrium between each other for event frame of references, which could occur, then this change in the two dimensions would set off a change in the next dimension, because the dimensions would stabilize each other and be interconnected to other dimensions. But if this would be so, then dimension would be infinite because TIME is based on events happening at a set interval and since events do not occur at the same interval, infinite dimensions would be created to rationalize this imperfection of vent intervals and therefore extending the universe made up of dimensions to infinity. Bu if there were infinite dimensions and an infinately expanding universe ... no the universe would not be expanding at all the universe is set and will always be the same in property. So this would mean the dimensions are infinately dividing dimensions in the whole universe, because the universe started with onle one dimension that was split infinately time, make them all infinately smaller yet equal, and when these two dimensions would not split, but meld, then they would be the only dimension that is different causing an imbalance, and then the dimension that is different causing an imbalance, and the other dimensions to collide and cause negative infinity on the dimensions shrinking and shrinking the total amount of dimensions down until there is only one dimension in the universe and this would be the standard. The utter perfections of rationality and predictability. It would therefore be perfect within itself. But we know that our dimension is exactly the same as this. So what says that these two entities are exactly the same? Simply another infinite division of an infinately