Slashdot Mirror


Map the Internet... In One Day?

rjbrown99 writes "There have been numerous stories over the past few years on Bill Cheswick's Internet Mapping Project. The Lumeta folks even created a company out of it. Well, now there is a competitor. A single guy with a single computer is working to accomplish the same feat - within ONE DAY and using open-source tools to do it. The new project is called Opte and can be found at www.opte.org." He's made some progress and is looking for volunteers.

12 of 263 comments (clear)

  1. It has to be asked.... by SpaceCadetTrav · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Exactly why do we need a "map" of the Internet?

    1. Re:It has to be asked.... by nate+nice · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A real word map could have many uses. First, it neat to see and learn from to see the real structure of this inter-network of computers. Secondly, graph theorists could use it for research etc as this is a real (as opposed to theoretical) graph so it has real uses. From this graph theory, we could think of new ways to enhance the internet to make it more reliable, faster and more secure. Many things can come from looking at what we have put together and then using our analytic skills to hypothesize about it. I'm sure I'm missing 100 other reasons why this is good.

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
  2. Re:Are we overlooking something? by ViolentGreen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think he means that the program will take less then one day to completely map the internet. Not less then one day to write/compile/run.

    --
    Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
  3. Re:Lets face it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You can't make money with computers anymore because some jackass is always trying to give away the same thing you're doing.

    You: Mam, can I help you over the street?
    Old Woman: Oh that's so nice from you.
    I'mTheAmericanDream: Hey wait, you can't help that woman for free. I've built my business plan on this. THIEVE!

  4. Re:Great! by gregfortune · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's the whole point. Existing methods take months while he claims it can be done in a single day with a single computer.

  5. Forget mapping, the whole net just visited by lb746 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Why bother mapping it, just post a link on /. and we've already sent a majority of the internet straight to him.

    We should just stand in line, take a number, and tell him the path we took to get there.

  6. Re:Creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How it appears graphically is decided by the person who translates the database to an image. They could make it S shaped if they really wanted. Not creepy.

  7. Re:Lets face it by Stone316 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Come on, be realistic. If a couple of guys can solve the same problem developing the software in their spare time and get results at a fraction of the time then that company doesn't deserve to make anymore or they should hire this guy.

    This is nothing new, you can find free software to solve just about any problem. People buy commercial software because in some cases free versions aren't advanced enough or easy enough to use or they want to buy support.

    --
    "Thanks to the remote control I have the attention span of a gerbil."
  8. Hierarchy by sploxx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Has anyone noticed that nearly all of the maps have a more or less tree-shaped structure?
    This means concentration of power. So, the real, failure-tolerant internet is gone, at least it seems to be.

  9. Re:This server will die ! by bigmouth_strikes · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If he's mapping the whole Internet in a day he should be able to stand up to a little Slashdotting, shouldn't he ?

    --
    Oh, I can't help quoting you because everything that you said rings true
  10. The Internet according to Garp by Alomex · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Notice that he maps the paths from his computer to the rest of the world. That is not the same as a map of the entire Internet.

    To illustrate, if I map routes from, say Chicago, I'm likely to miss the direct connection between Seattle and San Francisco, as there is no traffic I could generate that would take that path.

  11. Re:Disturbing by ultranova · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Of course, this could simply be a matter of traffick using the fastest route available. If there's an information superhighway and an information dirt path, then as long as the superhighway stays up, it's going to be used.

    In other words, the low-level interconnects probably wouldn't show up in a scan like this, because the backbone nodes are faster. That doesn't mean they aren't there, just that data prefers the faster routes as long as they are available. There could be a million paths that don't include the backbone nodes, but traceroute only shows one (fastest) path per trace, and thus they would never show up as long as the backbone stays up. To interpret this to mean they don't exist is analogous to taking the same route to work each day and saying there's no other possible route, since you've never used any other route. But as soon as there's an accident that causes that main road to become useless, traffick will simply use alternative paths, slowing it down but not stopping it entirely.

    To properly map the Internet, you would need millions of volunteer nodes, making traceroutes near and far. You can _not_ map the Net from a single point of view, because that's excatly what you get: a single viewpoint, which might show some detail nearby, but only the major traffick points at the far side of the Net. To get truly accurate results, you'd need to run this program from every single one of the class C networks, and then combine the results.

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.