Slashdot Mirror


Analyzing AT&T's Anti-Anti-Spam Patent

An anonymous reader writes "Dan Gillmor is reporting in his eJournal taken, in turn, from Gregory Aharonian: AT&T has apparently been awarded a patent for circumventing certain spam filters, thereby providing slimeball spammers with yet a bigger hammer!" The patent covers "A system and method for circumventing schemes that use duplication detection to detect and block unsolicited e-mail (spam.)", although it's unclear exactly what AT&T want it for.

12 of 314 comments (clear)

  1. That gives me an idea! by TiMac · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now all I need is an anti-patent patent and we can end all the stupid patent nightmares once and for all!

    --

  2. Up next.. by placeclicker · · Score: 5, Funny

    A patent on bank robbery!

    --

    Browse at -1, because trolls are often the most creative part of /.
  3. Re:Hey! Shortsighted people! by FearUncertaintyDoubt · · Score: 3, Funny
    by patenting an anti-anti-spam technique, AT&T can legally forbid spammers from using that technique

    Which would make it an anti-anti-anti-spam technique

  4. THey've patented something... illegal? by jesdynf · · Score: 2, Funny

    Okay. I can work with that. Now I shall patent a method to circumvent systems that use visual inspections to detect and block illegal quantities of cocaine from entering national and/or state jurisdictions.

    Forget trying to wrest money out of some crummy /spammers/.

    --
    Yahoo! Pipes are awesome. How awesome? http://pipes.yahoo.com/jesdynf/slashdot
  5. The next big patents? by joelparker · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can Slashdot patent anti-anti-anti-spam?
    And recursively more anti- as well?

  6. I sure hope AT&T don't enforce this patent by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2, Funny

    How will I achieve the longer, thicker penis that drive women wild while I'm talking on my newly range-enhanced cellphone to my stock broker that just found a great new company in Nigeria that is a sure bet?

  7. Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I wonder if hackers are now able to patent stack-smashing code, too. Maybe they could sue viruses and bugs out of existence!

  8. Re:ATT will be selling circumvention by dipipanone · · Score: 4, Funny

    2005...

    ATT sells their spam circumvention patents to SCO, who, dying from their fight with IBM, seeks to build a new business providing software tools for the spam community.

  9. Re:ATT will be selling circumvention by JamesP · · Score: 1, Funny

    Now all I need to do is patent the Anti-Anti-Anti-Spam technology...

    But there's more... I'll also be patenting the Anti-Anti-Anti-Anti-Spam technology.

    Next, I'll apply for the Anti-Anti-Anti-Anti-Anti-Spam technique...

    --
    how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
  10. Re:Hey! Shortsighted people! by jcr · · Score: 3, Funny

    My boss approached me once with some literature he received from one of these software companies. After my initial "WTF??? You aren't serious???" reaction I sat down with him and explained some of the history behind spamming, why it's a bad idea, would piss off our existing customers/alienate new ones, etc etc etc.

    I'm astounded at your self-control. I'd have slapped him sillty.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  11. A world of AT&T only spam? by Eric+Savage · · Score: 2, Funny

    As mentioned in a few other posts, this could mean AT&T can go after spammers for patent infringment. Now this seems unlikely, but if I got only one spam a day and it was from AT&T and I knew that they had hordes of lawyers tracking down "infringers" I would not only switch to AT&T, I would print out the daily message and admire it during the time I've previously allotted to hitting "D" a few hundred times...

    --

    This is not the greatest sig in the world, this is just a tribute.
  12. Infinite Loop? by Swanktastic · · Score: 2, Funny

    1) Slashdot links to article
    2) Article links to Slashdot discussion
    3) Slashdot links back to article
    4) Article links back to Slashdot discussion

    repeat...