Slashdot Mirror


Kasparov Wins Game 3 Against X3D Fritz

Vulcao writes "Garry Kasparov just brilliantly won game 3 in the Kasparov vs. X3D Fritz chess match, which pits man against machine. Kasparov created a positional advantage on the queen side with a very strong pawn structure to which Fritz didn't have an answer. The result is now 1.5 - 1.5, and the last game will be this Tuesday, Nov. 18."

17 of 434 comments (clear)

  1. For those who wish to bet... by r_glen · · Score: 3, Funny
  2. Checkmate by lewko · · Score: 5, Funny

    Subsequently, Kasparov created a positional advantage on the human side with
    a very strong finger pointed at the reset button to which Fritz didn't have an answer.

    --
    Do you or your partner snore? - Visit www.snoring.com.au
    1. Re:Checkmate by Wylfing · · Score: 5, Funny
      Subsequently, Kasparov created a positional advantage on the human side with a very strong finger pointed at the reset button to which Fritz didn't have an answer.

      And that is why Fritz sent a Terminator back in time, to get rid of Kasparov before he was born.

      --
      Our intelligent designer has never created an animal that we couldn't improve by strapping a bomb to it.
  3. There's the human advantage exposed right there by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Funny

    Kasparov created a positional advantage on the queen side with a very strong pawn structure to which Fritz didn't have an answer.

    Well, what can poor Fritz, a cold emotionless computer, do when a handsome russian stallion of a man puts his pawn on the queen's side? Of course he didn't have an answer ...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  4. Re:Just goes to show by spektr · · Score: 4, Funny

    People learn faster than machines.

    No, they just saw this stuff on TV. Once Fritz gains access to the Star Trek archives he won't again be so easily distracted and outplayed by Kasparov using his secret weapon: "how do you feel?".

  5. Kasparov's Comment by BinBoy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Kasparov: pwned!

    Programmer: No way! Look at my ping. It was lag!

  6. Re:Only a matter of time.. by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 3, Funny

    given a finite amount of time the human brain can figure out how to solve any problem.

    Okay, I give you 10 seconds to demonstrate the Fermat theorem : 1..2..3 ...

    Imho computers are 100 years too early to even compete with the human brain

    [/me checks the date]
    No, I knew I was right, it is 2003.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  7. Re:Eight Pawn Chess by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wanted to play because I was humilated at getting beat by the chessmaster on Nintendo.

    Good thing you latched on the chess game cartridge, otherwise you'd have grown a moustache, started wearing red overalls and sporting a strong Italien accent, and become a plumber ...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  8. Re:The game of Go ? by nodwick · · Score: 5, Funny
    I think it's a knee-jerk reflex against an inferiority complex. I mean, sure, they can beat us at chess, but what about GO?

    Kinda like how your average Slashdotter watching the crowd go wild over Barry Bonds breaking the home run record is secretly thinking, "Oh sure, but can he put together a Beowulf cluster of Linux boxes?"

  9. Human by cfuse · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does Kasparov play human beings anymore? or is he too good for us?

  10. It's not like I rode the Short Bus to school by teamhasnoi · · Score: 4, Funny
    but I have a long history of getting my ass kicked at chess. The only time I *ever* beat a computer at chess was when I played the easiest level on Chessmaster 2100 on my Apple IIgs. I celebrated for days.

    I played chess all the time with pals about 10 years ago. We were all at about the same level of bad. I thought I would prove my chess-skilz one day and played some guy at the local coffeeshop. After 3 moves, I was checkmated. My middle eastern opponent turned to my friend and said, "Your friend is stupid. I will not play him again.", swept all the pieces off the board, got up, shook his head and left.

    That stung. So You Go Gary! I must live vicariously through you! Kick some ass! Then I must go back to OS X gnuChess which mocks me every time I play, "You are stupid. I will not play you again."

    /me weeps into hands.

    1. Re:It's not like I rode the Short Bus to school by geekoid · · Score: 5, Funny

      haha, thats is a damn funny story.

      I remember one time, I was tossing darts, and won a game of cricket in the fewest possible throws.
      By the time I was on my last toss, everybody in the bar was gathered around. My last toss landed perectly, the crowd goes wild. I had a great reputation, free drinks when I retold that story, and I never, ever, threw darts anywhere near that bar again. heh.

      A matter of fact, about 10 years latter, I meet a guy at agaming clubg. He kept looking at me funny. Then one day he looks at me and runs off. about 30 minutes latter he returns. Turned out his father was the guy a beat, and gave him a picture of me tossing that last dart. the caption:
      "With practice comes perfection."

      I was laughing so hard, I had tears rolling down my cheeks.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  11. Re:The game of Go ? by wfberg · · Score: 4, Funny

    We haven't built a robot to play tennis either, tennis is simply a different problem with a much much larger data set, just like go.

    A simple wall-shaped opponent pressed right against the net, with a large enough surface area, will beat any opponent. Well, maybe with a hole in there for serving.

    A chess game with a 19x19 board would send a computer into shock too.

    Less so than Go, since with Go the number of possible moves at each junction in time is larger than in chess - Go on a chess-sized board still features a larger search space than chess. Just like 110 in binary is less than 110 in decimal.

    --
    SCO employee? Check out the bounty
  12. maybe Kasparov should be an Action Ranger by dandelion_wine · · Score: 4, Funny

    Al Gore: You already know Stephen Hawking. Also with us is Nichelle Nichols a.k.a. Commander Uhura.

    Nichols: Incoming transmission from MCI one rate department. It sounds like a limited time offer.

    Gore: Tell them I'm in the tub! To my left you'll recognise Gary Gygax, inventor of dungeons and dragons.

    Gygax: Greetings! It's a...[rolls dice.]...pleasure to meet you!

    Gore: And our summer intern, Deep Blue. The world's foremost chess playing computer.

    Deep Blue: Bishop to knight 4.

    Gore: Not all missions can be solved with chess, Deep Blue. Someday you'll understand that.

  13. Re:Eight Pawn Chess by Craig3010 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah and 3 Card Monte REALLY confuses the fuck out of them

  14. Re:The game of Go ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's a sad world when one has an inferiority complex against a database.

  15. Re:The game of Go ? by syle · · Score: 5, Funny

    "The depressing thing about tennis is that no matter how much I play, I'll never be as good a a wall. I played a wall once. They're fucking relentless...." --Mitch Hedberg

    --

    /syle