A Monocultural Alternative: TheOpenCD
GooseLiverPate writes "Computers and Composition Online has an article by Dr. Paul Cesarini concerning the risks of a Microsoft monoculture in education. He describes the relation between Open Source and Microsoft as: "one of gnats swarming around a large, slow-moving beast." and emphasises the lack of innovation in Internet Explorer and MS-Office. He suggests TheOpenCD as a possible bridge for schools and universities to Open Source, and includes a review of the newly released version 1.2."
A Monocultural Alternative: The OpenCD
...The key, as I see it, is to encourage people to use the high-quality Free Software now becoming available in the OS they are already using" (Nilsen Omma, 2002)
Dr. Paul Cesarini
Assistant Professor,
BGSU College of Technology
A Brief History of The OpenCD / Resisting the Monoculture / The Future / Conclusions / Works Cited
Introduction: A Brief History of The OpenCD
In April of last year, Henrik Nilsen Omma was discouraged. He and other enthusiasts of freely distributable Open Source Software (OSS) such as the Linux operating system grew increasingly frustrated at the lack of widespread appeal of this and similar software, beyond the so-called "techie" crowd. They knew the problem was not with the software itself. Free software such as the excellent Mozilla web browser was feature-rich compared to its often-patched, yet feature-bereft Windows counterpart. The same could be said for OpenOffice, a full-featured, free office productivity suite that included many standard features unavailable in then-current versions of Microsoft Office. Nilsen Omma voiced his concerns in an article on Newsforge, one of the premier sites devoted to Linux and related OSS. In this article, titled An Idea for a Free Software CD, Nilsen Omma argued that:
"there are many hurdles when persuading people to switch to Free Software. Most people will not change their entire operating system just for fun; it's too unfamiliar, and they will lose the use of all their favorite programs at the same time.
The article generated a great deal of interest from the open source community. At that point, Nilsen Omma set up a basic site for the project, dubbed The OpenCD. The goal was simple, if complicated: Create an Open Source showcase, where "new users can try out Open Source software in the comfort of their own, familiar operating system, rather than having to take the drastic step of reformatting their hard drive to install Linux". By focusing on showing the benefits of Open Source Software to a broader audience than that which typically uses it, Nilsen Omma hoped to encourage its adoption. (TheOpenCD, 2003)
Numerous volunteers joined and a considerable amount of time was spent debating the focus and scope of the project, coordinating tasks, and writing documentation. The group decided on releasing a CD, rather than just creating a site with download links to the respective programs. This decision was based on the fact that such sites already exist, and that the targeted demographic for the project -- those new to OSS -- might generally prefer not to have to download programs, and might instead prefer simple CD-based installation.
The result was the 1.0 version of The OpenCD, released as a freely downloadable ISO CD image, last December. Nilsen Omma acknowledges that going with an ISO is somewhat of a necessary evil, in that such disk images are typically meant for more technical users. However, the general assumptions is that these users will "download it, make CDs and give them to their less technical friends."
The criteria for determining which applications were included on the CD image were and still are fairly detailed, and involve a nomination process where testers review potential applications for quality, usability, and related factors. These testers then post their findings in forums on The OpenCD site, where further discussion takes place. The only "hard and fast" rule is that the CD image will not include two similar applications, even if bothare good. This is done to help reduce any likely confusion among the target demographic for the CD. Nilsen Omma considers this one of the projects best strengths. He asserts that their job "is to make difficult choices so that the user doesn't have to." (Nilsen Omma, personal communication, September 18, 2003)
While specifically hoping to attract "non-techies" to OSS, secondary and higher education institutions are also a key target group for this project. They have kept
I've verified it's the newer version, dating yesterday.
A software compilation to the OpenCD is the
...which is updated monthly with the latest versions of the most popular, high-quality open-source software out there.
Open Source Software CD
Anyone can download it via BitTorrent.
Be sure to check it out.
The pricing my school gets is obscene - I have made the pitch to the head of technology about open source - then he showed me in real dollars what we pay for the entire campus for MS products - think everything but servers for a 500 seat computer set up - $14000 a year. Oh, and we are looking into it, but it probably includes free student versions of VS.Net for any student enroled in a
Here are a few links to get you started
For programming stuff
For OS agreements w/MS
Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
Okay, I'll bite.
First, I'll admit that there isn't a whole lot of fundamental innovation when it comes to end user desktop software. Gnome and KDE take a lot of their interface decisions from Windows and Macintosh. Mozilla's interface is comparable to IE. GIMP has a totally different interface from any other image manipulation system I've seen, but from a functionality standpoint, it's not doing anything too far above and beyond the call of duty (unless you can master the Lisp-iness of their filter language).
A lot of this "lack of innovation" is due to the fact that people have come to expect these applications to behave in a given way, and the applications have to live within that framework. Another is due to the difficulty in discerning just what new and wonderful features can be added to the system. For example, I can't think of a single thing that I could suggest adding to Microsoft Word that would be gratefully used by more than a few percent of the user base.
Where the real innovation occurs is in niche applications and other small projects. BitTorrent, anyone? FreeNet, Wiki, Slashcode... all strike me as impressive, non-trivial ideas. The Linux kernel is constantly adding new features, and the development methodology is about as innovative as anything I can think of in the computing industry.
Finally, a lot of "innovation" is simply programmers implementing what the users suggested. If you have an idea for a nifty new feature in a software project, drop the developers a line. If it's not something of the "Sharks with friggin' laser beams" variety, they'll probably be grateful for the interest.
You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!
In KDE 3 they just click the MP3 files for them to be enqueued in their Noatun application.
In KDE 3 users can organize their separate tasks into separate desktops. In Windows they have to take the time and effort and download one of the (half-assed, if I may add) desktop support applications. Windows today takes time and effort to get the functionality that usually comes without any help on their part on KDE 3.
I gave the OpenCD to manty people for Xmas last
year. Its cheap and they seemed to like it.
http://www.edtech.wednet.edu/purchasing/
Link to the WSIPC price list for Microsoft products is somewhere on that site.
Prices are for Washington State school districts though.
But there's an ongoing question of how much actual education most of our schools are really interested in. There's a lot of evidence to support the theory that schools' basic function is socialization, and education is mostly a side effect. One of the better pieces of evidence is the widespread use of closed, proprietary computer systems, which don't qualify as "educational" except in the most minimal sense.
Not where I live. We have a very rigorous education system around here. I know the parents of one kindergarterner who were told by the school that socially, their daughter was right where she should be, but academically, she was too far behind to go to 1st grade. The matter of advancing her to 1st grade was completely out of the question. And this child is not what I regard as a slow learner.
The state that I live in (Connecticut) recommends that students be able to do the following before they enter school (I'm still working on a few of these myself.):
Perhaps, my college had the right idea. They are an engineering university located in an inner city adjacent to a high school, along with a few other colleges and univeristies. Ten years ago, these higher level institutions joined forces to change Newark, NJ's image into a college area by creating a better environment for their students and the area residents. Here's the good idea: this group wanted to create a science high school (stuff like engineering, computer science, medicine, architecture, etc.) adjacent to my school. Volunteer college students would be available as tutors to the high school students, creating a mentoring program. It looks like they're estimating that the high school will be complete in 2006. For those who care, you can read more about it here.
I teach for a very large school district in Texas. This past year the district purchased laptops for all the teachers. The laptops ran $1050. The license for office was $50 a pop. That is an amazing price, but the district refused to pay. Instead they bought a district support contract from Sun for StarOffice.
.doc (or .pdf) files, never the StarOffice format. In addition, many teachers I know are not very good at using computers. They have a hard enough time learning how to use MS Office without learning StarOffice, too.
No one uses it. Attachments still all show up as
Yes, its the same functions in a slightly different interface, but that's not the point. Teachers are never interested in doing extra work that they do not see will have a direct impact on their classroom. Its just too easy to ask the tech teacher for a copy of MS Office and install it anyway.
open mind: teaching computers the stuff
... just building a bit on both this story and the earlier slashdot conflag' entitled Vietnam goes open source
Two great new Vietnamese language Linux CD-distros are now available -- and make great toys for loading up Windows or Linux partitions straight past most file security most people apply:
01 KDLC 9.2 rc1 - Mandrake/Gnome based, ftp iso download
02 knoppix 3.3 caugiay - Knoppix/KDE based, ftp iso download
We're approaching fully localized OSS OS's and Office suites for the vast majority of the 80 million plus Vietnamese who can neither speak English nor afford MS's global one-price policy for licenses.
NB: MS promised an effective Viet-localized Windows/Office release back in '95. But, to date, nothing they've delivered has made a dent in the pirated US-English MS Vietnam-market-share (90%+).
Viva la HeteroISCult[TM,01]!
Down with HomoISCult [02].
All the best from,
The h0z at h0lug
Notes:
[01] heterogenous info-systems culture
[02] What does inbred pitbulls and an MS-monopolized IS infrastructure have in common? They're both crazed and dangerous.
OK, here are some starting points for Linux in Arabic:
s .org/4 arab.com/ (you need to read arabic for this one)l inuxarabia.com/
http://www.arabiclinux.com/
http://www.arabeye
http://www.linux-me.org/
http://www.linux
http://www.langbox.com/arabic/
http://www.
http://www.iraqilinux.org/
Those should do for a start.