Slashdot Mirror


Los Alamos Reconsiders Touch Screen Voting

goombah99 writes "Los Alamos county, which boasts the highest geek PhD per capita in the world and considerable clout in secure computing, has voted to rescind its previous plans to purchase Touch Screen voting systems and will ask the New Mexico's secretary of state to address its concerns regarding an imminent state-wide purchase. They may get forced by the Clerk's office to use them anyway if the state makes its bulk purchase of Sequoia AvcEdge touch screen systems with a Windows-based WinEDS database. The Los Alamos position is welcome news since it casts the rejection of these systems in a more sober light; widespread right-wing conspiracy theories have done great harm by galvanizing election officials to be dismissive of re-opening their consideration of the issue. What won the day was convincing the county they had until 2006 to comply with HAVA, and that better machines with voter verifiable audit trails and even open source, were on the way. There is also more in the local newspapers."

1 of 305 comments (clear)

  1. Los Alamos by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I know its been mentioned before, but I *Really* would feel more comfortable if the code for the evoting machines was completely open source. But then again, how easy would it be to modify the source and reinstall it? Voting is difficult in mass quantities. I don't know how we trust the results of any election. Its probely just as easy to skew the results of a paper election

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.