Slashdot Mirror


Tale of Two Tech Hubs: Silicon Glen & Chandiga

securitas writes "A pair of stories about two technology hubs in different parts of the world contrast and document their efforts to flourish as regional technological centers: Scotland's Silicon Glen and India's Chandigarh. The BBC explains that Silicon Glen is still struggling to recover from the technology bust with 15,000 jobs lost in the last year alone. 'Scotland's electronics sector contributes one-seventh of its gross domestic product, directly employs 45,000 workers, and accounts for more than half the country's exports,' which are down 50%. Meanwhile, the New York Times reports on northern India and the birth of a technology boom, as a group of government officials, consultants and high technology entrepreneurs is trying to transform the city of Chandigarh from a 'sleepy farm state capital into the "technology hub of northern India."' The city is competing with other Indian cities by offering 'lower labor costs than India's "first tier" technology hubs, places like Bangalore, Hyderabad, Bombay and Gurgaon, outside New Delhi.' As Chandigarh competes with its rivals for call centers and software development parks, some of those cities are experiencing a labor shortage of skilled workers. These aren't the only two places with such reversals of fortune - how does your region fare?"

4 of 263 comments (clear)

  1. Re:I find it amazing by gid13 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't know for sure, but my guess is that the tech industry jobs in India pay more than sweatshop jobs.

    In any case, it seems to me that an interesting solution would be for "wealthy" countries to impose minimum wages on companies that do business in their country but employ people in other countries. E.g., if Nike had to pay its African workers, say, half of the U.S. minimum wage, or else be forbidden from doing any business at all in the States.

    That way, Americans would be less freaked out about losing their jobs to foreigners because it wouldn't happen so much, and the sweatshop employees that remained would actually be getting a significant level of monetary help.

    Of course, I have a suspicion that Indian tech workers make more than U.S. minimum wage, and as far as I can see, there isn't too much that can be done about that given American ideals. In particular, capitalism is supposed to promote efficiency by rewarding people who do things cheaper. And if Indians provide better tech value, it seems to me that it's the American way to farm out those jobs.

  2. Resources by BWJones · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This should exemplify that IT resources and programmers are finite. Jobs dry up in one area only to resurface where costs are lower.

    Any industry that becomes a commodity will undergo a similar transformation. This is exactly what made the whole silicon valley experiment so wildly successful in that an entirely new paradigm was created that existed in few other places. When the "resource" became common and the concepts became commodities that could be moved around, traded and bargained for, the result was job movement to where those who had the skills would work for less. So, the trick is to innovate and again create for the world markets and ourselves skill-sets that are unique and in demand for the products or services they provide.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
  3. Re:New emerging markets aren't playing fair ? by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm sure your post is particularly interesting to former steel workers in Wales and elsewhere around the world that have lost their jobs because of the hefty import tarriffs on foreign steel introduced by the Bush administration.

    Seriously, if you're going to talk about free markets, then feel free to do so. But first have the decency to acknowledge that the US definition of free trade isn't 100 percent free.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  4. We ought to be allowed to be as mobile as jobs. by thisissilly · · Score: 5, Insightful
    IMO, the part of the problem with outsourcing is that the jobs are mobile, but the people are not allowed to be as mobile as the jobs, due to immigration laws.

    For instance, if my job were outsource to India for 1/3 of the salary they pay me, but that turns out to be a decent living wage in India, I can't say "fine, I'll take the pay cut and move to India!", even if I want to. If all the jobs in my area of expertise move out of the country, I can't follow them, I have to find a new field of employment, because of artificial barriers to my mobility.

    If there are going to be artificial barriers to my mobility, I want artificial barriers to my job's mobility as well.