Critical Eye on SpamAssassin
ErrorBase writes "In this Infoworld article, Logan G. Harbaugh makes a great deal about an ancient (2.44) version of SpamAssassin comparing it with newer comercial variants.
Quote : You get what you pay for. [...] However, it took more than 10 times as long to install and configure SpamAssassin as it did any of the other products. "
Why did he not ask Kevin Railsback who had the whole thing working some while ago?)"
The idea being that good programmes are classed as, if you like, spam and bad ones aren't. Therefore anything that gets tagged can be considered a programme that might be interesting to the user.
The problem is that I've not seen a good *basic* description of how the algorithm works (i'll be implementing it in Perl with a view to porting it to other languages). Preferably with some sample values and a step by step guide on how the final score comes out.
Can anyone point me to a resource? Paul Grahams description is good, but the formula makes no sense and there aren't any examples.
Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.