Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

A Secure and Verifiable Voting System

Posted by michael on from the he-makes-it-look-easy dept.

meese writes "The cryptographer David Chaum, through discussion with top cryptographers such as Ron Rivest, has designed a secure and verifiable voting system. One of the goals of his design is that anyone can verify that votes were tabulated correctly. It's good to see real security/crypto people working on this problem. They also have a press release."

4 of 346 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Combination.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Closed source + Paper green = secure voting.

    They've figured out already.

  2. Re:How about by switcha · · Score: 5, Funny
    You get your fat ass away from monday night football for 30 minutes, drive down to the polling location, and vote.

    The fogies in Fla missed voting correctly by about a 1/4 inch. You just missed voting correctly by 24 hours.

    --
    You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
  3. Designed by Cryptographers, not Committees! by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny
    So a couple of noted cryptographers have come up with a secure, verifiable, electronic voting system and put the design out in the open for anyone to use. Like that was a challenge.

    Like, hey, who the hell does this Rivest guy think he is, and what (apart from this stupid "Ph.D" stuff in "Computer Science" or "Mathematics" or "Cryptography", such a small title he has) makes him think he's any smarter than Penelope Bonsall, who's got a way cooler title "Director of the Office of Election Administration at the Federal Election Commission".

    "The computer scientists are saying, 'The machinery you vote on is inaccurate and could be threatened; therefore, don't go. Your vote doesn't mean anything.'

    Penelope Bonsall, Director of the Office of Election Administration at the Federal Election Commission, A Very Important Person Who's Smarter And Better Than Those Goofy Computer Scientists Because She Has A Bigger Title And Burns Through More Taxpayer Dollars In A Week Than That Rivest Dude Probably Generated In His Entire Working Career!

    Rivest's system is clearly unworkable. Where's the wining and dining of sales reps? Where's the backroom deals involving hookers and cocaine? Where's the vendor-lock-in? Where are the service contracts and extra government departments required to oversee them? Oh, sure, Rivest can lay the smack down on "where's the beef" when it comes to building a secure and verifiable electronic voting system, but where's the pork?

  4. yes by commodoresloat · · Score: 3, Funny

    presumably, they will be doing the voting.