Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Spam Through HTTP Referrer Logs

Posted by timothy on from the laundering-kiddie-porn-money dept.

Max Romantschuk writes "This morning while doing my usual log review of reader activity on my weblog, I discovered some rather strange sites, porn sites, which were linking to me. Closer inspection revealed that they weren't linking to me at all, but that someone had falsified the HTTP referrer header to inject the links into my logs." (Read more below.)

Max Romantschuk continues: "It took a moment to realize what was going on, but then it dawned to me, I was being spammed through my referrer logs! A quick google search on the words "referrer spam" confirmed my suspicions, this was indeed a widespread practice, and not new at all. In fact, Wired had an article on the subject dating almost a year back. It turns out the spammers aren't after blog authors, but what they are actually doing is targetting people which publish their referrer logs on their sites automatically. Fortunately, I don't.

I run a very small site, and get about 20 to 50 visits a day, and I don't publish my logs. Not exactly a likely target, am I? Clearly these spammers seem to do this in volume, and the phenomenon is bound to increase as email spamming is becomming increasingly hard. With email spam, IM spam, Windows Messaging spam (NET SEND popups) and HTTP referrer spam, how long will it take until every open technology has to be locked down? I hate to say it, but I doubt Wikis and similar systems will stay open for very long if things keep going in this direction."

8 of 52 comments (clear)

  1. Not Always Spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
    If you snoop on people, you get what you deserve.

    Personally I don't like people tracking my referrer links. Mind your own business. If you want to see who is linking you, you can do that with google. I know people disagree, since your website is your business. But I don't like being monitored that closely.

    Maybe I'll set my referrer to goats.cx.

    BTW, this story has been seen on Slashdot before.

  2. Well, by noselasd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Last time I asked people about this, I was told this was script kiddies
    scanning for open proxies and similar things, using some certain scripts/whatever which annoyed the logs with falsifyed referes.

  3. Re:The idea behind a Wiki by cfradenburg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Due to the fact that anyone can maintain it spammers can add and change it. Now, can any number of people find and delete spam in a Wiki faster than however many bots the spammers decide to throw at it?

  4. Legality of wiki spam? by TimButterfield · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Web sites can be defaced. This is typically thought of as illegal. Does the level of security on that site affect the legality of the defacement? Just because a wiki is more easily editable than an otherwise non-secure site should not automatically allow hijacking of that site for purposes other than those intended by its owner. Would the appearance of 'specific wording' on the site make enforcement of this easier?

  5. links to resumes by displague · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I would like to know who goes around posting links to their resumes as referers to your website?

    Is it the people looking for jobs, or is it some resume posting service? I get about a half-dozen of these per month.

    --
    Marques Johansson
  6. MovableType Blogs by ceejayoz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's becoming a rather large problem on MovableType blogs. Apparently, the spammed referrers are usually fake blogs, that are front sites to get a porn webcam link high in Google PageRank.

    http://echo.ashpool.org/blog/305/
    http://www.idly.org/2003/11/14/porn_sites_hiding_b ehind_blogs.php
    http://www.jayallen.org/comment_spam/2003/11/alert _referral_spamming

    1. Re:MovableType Blogs by Dachannien · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Fortunately, Google is working on this problem.

      As for solving the issue of false referrers, why not just modify where the referrer ends up based on whether the specified referring page actually has a link to you or not. The distributed effects of zillions of bloggers all spamming the spam site with automated HTTP requests should be enough to dissuade the spammers from continuing :)

  7. Spider them before publishing log by Anm · · Score: 2, Interesting


    I would think that it would easy enough to send a spider to the referrer page and search for the referred page. If you don't find it, delete it from the log. In fact, you wouldn't even need the spider because the link should be the exact page anyway.

    This also becomes a means to maintain the blacklists other have mentioned.

    Isn't this simple to do?