Slashdot Mirror


GUI Designer For Eclipse

Flu writes "Finally, a free (as in speech and beer) and official GUI designer has been released for Eclipse! Just a few days before the Eclipse 3.0 M5 build was released, a complete plugin for creating GUI's was released as well, as one of the Eclipse tools projects. Check it all out on the official site for the Visual Editor Project. At last, the (probably) best free IDE for Java (and C) contains a GUI editor! Personally, I intend to put up an IBM logo to worship next to my desk, as a thank you for the Eclipse! :-)"

5 of 68 comments (clear)

  1. Required Comparison Question by forsetti · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, how 'bout it -- Eclipse vs Netbeans? I'm looking to hear from people that have actually used both.

    --
    10b||~10b -- aah, what a question!
  2. License by JohnFluxx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hi,
    Could someone who understands the license of eclipse tell me what exactly the problem is in getting eclipse SWT to use QT?

    1. Re:License by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      what exactly the problem is in getting eclipse SWT to use QT

      I'd bet the problem is with the QT licence - which essentially says that you can't build commercial applications with it without paying a licence fee that's amazingly expensive. Don't forget that Eclipse is being developed by IBM, under a "CPL" licence which may not be 100% GPL compatible - using QT would infect their codebase.

      Last I checked, prices are:

      QT: $3000 per seat per platform (for just the QT library alone).
      Microsoft Visual C++ 2003 .NET: $300 per seat (includes the MFC library).

      It's literally 10 times cheaper to develop for Windows than QT.. ~7 times cheaper if you include the cost of the OS (about $130 for Windows 2k OEM).

      The cost of using QT is absolutely retarded and will be the downfall of KDE in the long run because GNOME / GTK+ will be used for all commercial apps.

  3. Was supporting open source Lou Gerstner's idea? by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 4, Interesting


    From the parent post: "Personally, I intend to put up an IBM logo to worship next to my desk, as a thank you for the Eclipse! :-)"

    The underlying point here is that supporting open source software is an extremely good way for a company to get positive publicity.

    Ten dollars of support for open source is probably more powerful than $1000 of stupid TV ad campaigns in which stupid-looking people go around in stupid-looking "space" suits. (IBM needs a better advertising agency. I saw an interview on the Charlie Rose show of the woman who heads the agency IBM uses. She knows nothing about technical things, obviously doesn't care about technical things, and obviously believes that technically knowledgeable people are her social inferiors. She is disgustingly destructive toward her client, IBM. While they're considering this, IBM should fire its marketing manager for letting that happen. Could I do better? Yes, wake me up any day at four o'clock in the morning and I could do better before I was completely awake.)

    At one time, IBM was hated as much as Microsoft is now, because of IBM's extremely adversarial business methods. There were many technically knowledgeable people who would not consider working for IBM. That seems to be changing now.

    Was supporting open source Lou Gerstner's idea? I don't know. However, it was an excellent idea.

    Recently, a CEO asked me what I thought of Microsoft's .NET. I told him the biggest drawback was that using .NET means that you are a partner of Microsoft. (The second is that .NET programs are easily de-compiled; other people can easily examine your business logic if they have a copy of your program.)

    People like me influence purchasing decisions of highly technical products. People like me say that it doesn't matter how much money Microsoft has, or how strong a virtual monopoly, Microsoft is on the way down. I remember Microsoft's adversarial behavior. I remember Novell's adversarial behavior, and I will never, never forget, even though I don't do business with Novell any longer.

    The point is that supporting open source software impresses me and other technically knowledgeable people who 1) influence purchases, and 2) are the kind of people a technical company might want to hire.

    So, two rules for running a technically knowledgeable company: 1) Find some way of making money that doesn't involve any instances of doing harm. 2) Build a positive attitude toward your company by supporting the work of the world: Open Source.

    1. Re:Was supporting open source Lou Gerstner's idea? by Feztaa · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Read my Journal entry about it.

      [/plug] :)