On Nintendo And Marketing Myopia
Thanks to Nintendojo for their editorial discussing why Nintendo may be heading for a fall by branding itself a 'video game company', as opposed to Sony and Microsoft's wider goals as part of the "entertainment or technology industries". The writer points out: "Theodore Levitt introduced an idea called Marketing Myopia. To summarize the basic idea of his concept: in an industry where future growth seems guaranteed, a leading company will mislabel itself and ultimately lead to its own downfall." Apparently, the best historical example of this is the railroad industry, who "...labeled themselves as being in the railroad business and not the transportation business, limiting themselves and causing their own downfall." The writer concludes: "The industry has changed. Nintendo is no longer the biggest player in a relatively large niche market. They are in last place in a huge segment of the home entertainment sector, and they need to remember this fact, because no one needs another Amtrak."
So base your "research" on some facts.
I was going to mod you down, but stupidity like this shouldn't be silenced, it should be corrected.
Also.. Pepsi is an incredibly diverse company. They have 11 unique brands and a bunch of variations
like a decaf this and french vanilla flavored that that.
Dr. Pepper is owned by Cadbury Schweppes, another large multi-national corporation.
Gee... it seems like those two examples you gave suck... just like your 'insightful' commentary about EA Games and Nintendo.
Burn Karma Burn
[Fuck Beta]
o0t!