Slashdot Mirror


Who Owns The Facts?

windowpain writes "With all of the furor over the Patriot Act a truly scary bill that expands the rights of corporations at the expense of individuals was quietly introduced into congress in October. In Feist v. Rural Tel. Serv. Co. the Supreme Court ruled that a mere collection of facts can't be copyrighted. But H.R. 3261, the Database and Collections of Information Misappropriation Act neatly sidesteps the copyright question and allows treble damages to be levied against anyone who uses information that's in a database that a corporation asserts it owns. This is an issue that crosses the political spectrum. Left-leaning organizations like the American Library Association oppose the bill and so do arch-conservatives like Phyllis Schlafly, who wrote an impassioned column exposing the bill for what it is the week after it was introduced."

2 of 490 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Mississippi Ghostse by i_am_syco · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Man...go AC or something before you go and make yourself look like an ass like that. Tha's not coo', j0.

  2. Facts are overrated. by roman_mir · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Facts are meaningless. You could use facts
    to prove anything that's even remotely true.