Slashdot Mirror


Peter Jackson Hints At The Hobbit

Hellboy0101 writes "News.com.au is reporting that New Line Cinema is currently in talks to purchase the rights to the film adaptation of The Hobbit. There are apparently some difficulties with getting the go ahead from Tolkien's son Christopher, who is executor of the estate. When asked if New Line has approached him about the project, Jackson said he has not ruled it out, but not until after King Kong is done. 'New Line, which spent $US300million ($415 million) making the films, is already planning to continue its Rings success with an adaptation of Tolkien's novel The Hobbit. More difficulties with the Tolkien estate were looming, said Jackson, who added that he would be keen to get involved after he finishes remaking King Kong in 2006. "New Line haven't actually talked to me about The Hobbit. I know there's difficulty about the rights, certainly if they want to talk to me about it I'd be keen," he said.'"

9 of 721 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Details, please? by Hungus · · Score: 4, Informative

    Chris Tolkien Gaurds his Father's properties like Smaug Dwarven gold and mithril. The attitudes seem similar too. He single handedly put Iron Crown into bankrupcy by jacking up the licencing costs a couple of years ago, even going so far as to have the printed works seized and destroyed even though they were printed and delivered while still under license. Of course this is all old news to any of my fellow Rolemaster / MERP players.

    --
    Bad Panda! No Bamboo for you! In matters of importance ACs will not be responded to. Want to say something critical,OK
  2. Re:Keen? by Decaffeinated+Jedi · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually, apostrophes can also denote missing (or missin') letters/characters. So, the proper way to refer to the decade would be the '50s.

    --
    DecafJedi
    my weblog: apropos of something
  3. Re:ATTN: PETER JACKSON by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 5, Informative

    Besides, the animated version of The Hobbit is already a gem.

    Have you ever seen the damned thing? I have to admit I think it got the mood right, but man, those misshapen heads- and they really screwed up the elves! They were like little gremlins! The cartoon creators were obviously thinking of the elves that live up at the North Pole making presents for Santa. That's the wrong kind of elf. Although they did refrain from skateboarding down stairs while shooting arrows. That's one thing they did get right.

  4. Re:ATTN: PETER JACKSON by tbmaddux · · Score: 4, Informative
    You ever notice Gimli says this right after he's finished shattering his axe in a vain attempt to cleave the Ring?
    Watch the extended edition of FOTR; in one of the documentary segments Rhys-Davies goes through his axe arsenal. He carries around seven of them.
    --
    Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?
  5. Re:ATTN: PETER JACKSON by RedWizzard · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you watch carefully you'll notice that Gimli grabs (and shatters) the axe of the dwarf sitting next to him. He's one smart dwarf, that Gimli.

  6. Re:King Kong Bomb by Ores · · Score: 5, Informative

    After some googling i found this. $100million, not that unreasnoble (and if it goes over budget jackson foots the bill personally) This is far more than a rumour, its already in preproduction and has been for a while. It has been his plan to remake it well before LOTR, with scripts availiable online dating to 1996. It seemes to me you are being overly critcal.

  7. Re:just saw Return of the King by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Informative

    - It is *long* (we didn't get an intermission)

    Indeed! I didn't actually notice this until I read your post and checked at IMDb.

    FOTR: 178 min (208 min)
    TTT: 179 min (222 min)
    ROTK: 210 min

    Are Peter Jackson actually going to make an Extended Edition of ROTK? I assumed so before, but seeing the non-EE version is about as long...??

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  8. Yes, it's travesty called "not reading the post" by Shadowlore · · Score: 5, Informative

    It is not insightful, it is flat out wrong on so many things wrong.

    Scroll to the top and reread the story.

    Wait, don't both here it is:
    "New Line, which spent $US300million ($415 million) making the films, is already planning to continue its Rings success with an adaptation of Tolkien's novel The Hobbit. "

    That plainly says they spent the money on the LoTR series, not on the King Kong Remake. Further hints include the little know fact that "films" is plural, whereas "the King Kong remake" is singular. ;)

    Oh, and not to pick any nits or anything, but Universal is the one paying Jackson to do the remake of King Kong, and has budgeted 100 million to the project.

    The only "insight" is that Simonetta didn't seem to read the original post. The tragedy is that s/he went off on poor defenseless strawman, and got a +5 insightful.

    Just goes to show that put enough monkeys at a keyboard and let them bang away, eventually they'll mod anything and everything up to +5 insightful.

    --
    My Suburban burns less gasoline than your Prius.
  9. Re:Fact check -- STOP blaming the Tolkien Estate! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just a sec....

    Isn't NewLine part of AOL^H^H^H Time Warner?
    According to This, they are.

    And Warner Pictures is too?

    Considering there were a number of reports that TW's profits for the last few years was largely influenced by LOTR:FOTR & TTT - it shouldn't take much for NewLine to receive the rights....

    Should it?