Slashdot Mirror


After The GNOME Bounties, It's Mozilla's Turn

MikeCapone writes "Slashdot had an article about the GNOME bounties a few days ago, but now, thanks to the Shuttleworth Foundation (created by Mark Shuttleworth, the guy who went into the ISS as a Soyuz cosmonaut a couple of years ago), the Mozilla project also has some monetary incentives. The budget for 2004 is USD$100,000."

4 of 290 comments (clear)

  1. I am still waiting by mental_telepathy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    for a good tool for combining people who want to same software and are willing to pay. Like sourceforge and paypal rolled into one.
    My dream software - a decent open source fantasy sports dollar based draft solution. And I know I'm no the only one.

  2. Re:Independent Contractors? by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Dude, this is like so little cash. This is roughly the salary of one person for a year. In exchange for that, you get hundreds of worker bees.

  3. Re:Independent Contractors? by Stile+65 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    $100K for a year will hire maybe two contractors or one really good contractor. Contractors don't usually charge per task, either, but per hour - so you don't have any guarantee this way that the code will be done either.

    --
    I claim first use of "Error No. 0B" - or "No. 0B error." It'll be the new ID 10T!
  4. Re:My Mozilla bounty by Boing · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I don't think per-site patches are any way to fix a site with bad HTML and JavaScript

    No, the problem is not hotmail, it's that the "one browser window" idea that tabs were supposed to make possible is not possible with respect to javascript-created windows. That has nothing to do with standards conformance, since "tabs" in themselves are not part of any web standard. They're just an adaptation of the "window" model into a better organizational system.