Slashdot Mirror


"Budget" Chips go Head-to-Head

StewedSquirrel writes "Anandtech has published an article taking a look at the low-end of the CPU market today. It takes Intel's newest Celeron processors against the AthlonXP and Duron with a Pentium 4 1.8GHz thrown in for comparison. All of these processors will cost you under $120, but the article shows that the old Duron (at barely $40) can out-perform Intel chips costing nearly 3x as much. In addition, it shows that the performance of the Athlon XP is head and shoulders above the Celeron processors, while costing roughly the same."

17 of 372 comments (clear)

  1. They missed the green one! by swordboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    They didn't even tackle the the Green Celeron. After all, Celeron is derived from the latin word 'celer', meaning speed. Of course, celery is the fastest of all vegetables.

    On a serious note, people, including myself, are starting to worry about power consumption. I'd like to pick up a low power device for a BSD gateway.

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    1. Re:They missed the green one! by jaavaaguru · · Score: 1, Funny

      "Celeron" is a combination of "celery" and "onion". That is why we should refer to them as celery-onions.

  2. Re:axp2500+ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny
    I love my shiny new AthlonXP 2500+. $90 for retail packaging, scoring well above my old P3-500, with plenty of room to overclock.

    You're comparing a processor that runs at well over 2GHz and goes head to head with P4-2.4GHz chips to a P3-500? In that case, my 1 GHz Via C3 Nehemiah processor scores well above my 90 MHz Pentium.

  3. Well, Duh... by evilviper · · Score: 3, Funny

    If anyone here didn't already know this, please raise your hand...

    Anyone???

    Anyone at all???

    Hello???

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  4. No wonder AMD won by gyp · · Score: 5, Funny

    The article had 3, yes 3, banner ads for AMD when I viewed it.

    Conspiracy mod ~ON~

    1. Re:No wonder AMD won by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      But which one won in your version of the article?-)

  5. Mods haven't had their morning cup of joe yet .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    So to summarize the parent. Intel big, lots-o-bucks. AMD small, greater risk, "better" product. Sometimes money wins over quality

    Well, with economic brilliance such as this, we all know who'll be taking over for Greenspan when he retires.

  6. Re:It's clear... by mccalli · · Score: 5, Funny
    It's time for people to stop rewarding the Intel marketing machine, and start buying the best tech...

    I agree. G5s all round then. :-)

    Cheers,
    Ian

  7. More proof that people will never hear of by DrugCheese · · Score: 1, Funny

    But Intel will continue to bully themselves deeper into markets, threatening new chip makers and computer manufactorers with it's giant weight.

    HURRY!! Someone slap them on the wrist!!!

    --
    *DrugCheese rants*
  8. Re:axp2500+ by richie2000 · · Score: 3, Funny
    You're comparing a processor that runs at well over 2GHz

    1833 MHz, actually (if it's the Barton core 2500+). AMD+ Marketing+ strikes again!

    In that case, my 1 GHz Via C3 Nehemiah processor scores well above my 90 MHz Pentium.

    Well, it does, doesn't it? And you love that CPU for it, don't you? :-)

    --
    Money for nothing, pix for free
  9. 18.4 seconds to compile quake3 by iamthemoog · · Score: 2, Funny

    (Page 8) is this correct? 18.4 Seconds to compile QuakeIII Arena Source Code on a 2600+ ? Maybe it's right, but I was expecting it to be longer.

    Damn that's fast - all those months/years of id's hard work, only to compile in 18 seconds on a budget processor....

    --
    No Norm, those are your safety glasses; I'll wear my own thanks...
  10. Nice Timing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    I've just received 5 P4 celery systems to install as part of a small cluster. The install is going down today.

    Damn you Slashdot and Anandtech....

  11. Re:Who needs faster? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    > I'm running an AMD K6 1.1 GhZ chip

    Ladies and gentlemen, our new overclocking champion!

  12. Re:Upgrades not always necesary... by kavau · · Score: 3, Funny
    Well, I put together a nice machine for myself with a 2.4GHz Pentium this summer. Now, every time I browse through the ads that clog my mailbox, I feel so.. well, out of date! I used to be a sociable geek, but now I don't dare to talk about computer hardware anymore, because I fear the topic of CPUs might come up. If people ask me about my processor speed, I usually just mumble something under my breath. If I had only gone with the 2.8GHz model...

    I think it's time to get that 3.2GHz processor and regain my confidence!

  13. Re:It's clear... by shepd · · Score: 2, Funny

    >but I know the thing will work and NEVER crash.

    Unless you need to divide numbers.

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  14. Re:A war on many fronts is a war of attrition by LetterJ · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah. The Decaf Decision of 1999 nearly sunk them. Fortunately they hired Juan Valdez to take over their coffee decisions and managed to recover.

  15. *sigh* by mntgomery · · Score: 3, Funny

    Its depressing when the "low end of the CPU market" beats all four of your machines.

    --

    This comment was generated by a squadron of trained super elite albino ninja chickens for you.