"Budget" Chips go Head-to-Head
StewedSquirrel writes "Anandtech has published an article taking a look at the low-end of the CPU market today. It takes Intel's newest Celeron processors against the AthlonXP and Duron with a Pentium 4 1.8GHz thrown in for comparison. All of these processors will cost you under $120, but the article shows that the old Duron (at barely $40) can out-perform Intel chips costing nearly 3x as much. In addition, it shows that the performance of the Athlon XP is head and shoulders above the Celeron processors, while costing roughly the same."
They didn't even tackle the the Green Celeron. After all, Celeron is derived from the latin word 'celer', meaning speed. Of course, celery is the fastest of all vegetables.
On a serious note, people, including myself, are starting to worry about power consumption. I'd like to pick up a low power device for a BSD gateway.
Life is the leading cause of death in America.
If anyone here didn't already know this, please raise your hand...
Anyone???
Anyone at all???
Hello???
Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
The article had 3, yes 3, banner ads for AMD when I viewed it.
Conspiracy mod ~ON~
I agree. G5s all round then. :-)
Cheers,
Ian
1833 MHz, actually (if it's the Barton core 2500+). AMD+ Marketing+ strikes again!
In that case, my 1 GHz Via C3 Nehemiah processor scores well above my 90 MHz Pentium.
Well, it does, doesn't it? And you love that CPU for it, don't you? :-)
Money for nothing, pix for free
I think it's time to get that 3.2GHz processor and regain my confidence!
Its depressing when the "low end of the CPU market" beats all four of your machines.
This comment was generated by a squadron of trained super elite albino ninja chickens for you.