Slashdot Mirror


Treating Cancer with Beams of Anti-Matter

Zeinfeld writes "According to this Economist article scientists at CERN are using beams of antimatter to destroy cancer cells. The basic idea is that you make some anti-protons, whizz them round in a accelerator to get them moving at a decent rate then fire them at living tissue. They burrow down to the desired depth, find a friendly proton and do a spot of mutual anihilation, releasing sufficient energy in the process to kill a cell or two. The trick is that matter/anti-matter anihilation is a bit like nuclear fission, it does not work if the particles are moving too fast. The anti-proton has to be moving slowly enough to get pulled into the orbit of some atomic nucleus and actually collide. This allows the treatment to be fine tuned so it only affects the tissues at a very specific depth - unlike traditional therapies which zap everything in the line of fire."

6 of 55 comments (clear)

  1. So hospitals... by RalphBNumbers · · Score: 4, Funny

    are going to need multi-km particle accelerator/colliders now?

    Why do I get the feeling I can't afford to have cancer...

    --
    "The worst tyrannies were the ones where a governance required its own logic on every embedded node." - Vernor Vinge
    1. Re:So hospitals... by PhuCknuT · · Score: 2, Funny

      You can afford to have cancer, it's the living through it part you might have a problem with.

  2. Its not a death ray... by kabocox · · Score: 3, Funny

    Your honor it isn't a death ray that I've developed, it is a cancer treatment device.

  3. My anti-self by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    So now you're giving my anti-self my cancer. That's kinda mean.

    1. Re:My anti-self by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well have you SEEN that evil goatee he has? I'm sure he deserves it.

  4. Re:Zap everything in the line of fire??? by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2, Funny
    Thanks for the reply. I did RT[F]A - my "Sheesh" was aimed at the author of the Slashdot synopsis, not the author of the article.

    Hey don't blame me. Do you guys understand what it takes to get a story accepted by Slashdot? Giving an accurate and concise review of the facts gets you nowhere in this town.

    Its breathless tabloidese or your post goes straight into the bit bucket. I had to spend several hours working out how to turn it into an anti-Microsoft story first.

    --
    Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
    Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/