SCO Ordered to Produce Evidence
harmless_mammal and others wrote in with news from the SCO-IBM hearing in Utah today - apparently the judge has ordered SCO to respond to IBM's discovery requests within 30 days. IBM is asking SCO to tell IBM precisely what code it is alleging is infringing, and to date SCO has failed to show any evidence whatsoever. Some reports from the hearing are at Groklaw, which is already slow under the load. If SCO continues to fail to produce the evidence they've claimed they have, the judge will likely be very displeased, perhaps dismissing the lawsuit entirely.
You GAY HOMOSEXUAL FAGGOT.
You hear that!! *silence*
Thats the sound of people NOT caring
Since I sort of got into groklaw... /. warning.
Authored by: Waterman on Friday, December 05 2003 @ 03:14 PM EST
Look out PJ when the Slashdot crowds finds out about this.
Sugesstion would be to tell Slashdot but request that they not link to the site
for a while.
We need to read all the stuff first that has been going on today. :-)
[ Reply to This ]
* /. warning. - Authored by: Waterman on Friday, December 05 2003 @ 03:17 PM EST
* 56 second hang time - Authored by: trox on Friday, December 05 2003 @ 03:53 PM EST
When life hands you lemons, grab the salt and pass the tequilla...
Crazy idea - change YOUR preferences to match YOUR preference and leave the rest of us alone.
"IANAL." God, SHUT UP.
If you're going to preface all your comments with "I am not a lawyer," then don't offer legal commentary to begin with. You're basically admitting your opinion is invalid and uninformed.
On the same /. front page, you claim SCO is asking IBM to make SCO's case for SCO because of their discovery claims. Man, /.ers are either stupid or hypocrites
when GWB got into office, he ordered the DOJ to back down
Why does everyone keep repeating this urban legend? Please cite some factual evidence that this is what happened.
Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
Only a derranged mind could do the thing Darl McBride has done!